Skip to Content

Changes for page Claims

Last modified by Cesar van der Poel on 2022/04/03 18:56
From version Icon 4.1 Icon
edited by Xin Wan
on 2022/03/07 14:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 7.1 Icon
edited by Vishruty Mittal
on 2022/03/22 11:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.xinwan
1 +XWiki.Vishruty
Content
... ... @@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
7 7  + Better mood after talking to robot
8 8  
9 9  - getting angry when robot not letting him/ her pass.
10 -- get anoyed by robot
10 +- get annoyed by robot
11 11  
12 +To overcome the negatives effects, the robot alerts the caretaker and the user is allowed to go outside as long as he/she has some company (OB03)
13 +
12 12  **for caretaker:**
13 13  
14 14  + Spends less time watching the door and checking if everybody is still there. Therefore the caretaker has more time and is more relaxed to focus on the individual PwD.
... ... @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
22 22  
23 23  **From these aspects follow the claims:**
24 24  
25 -CL01: The PwD does not leave the care home
27 +CL01: The PwD does not leave the care home without the caretaker
26 26  CL02: PwD's mood is improved
27 27  CL03: Robot brings PwD back to reality
28 -CL04: The music reminds the PwD of the intended situation or place
29 -CL05: No caretaker is needed to prevent PwD from wandering
30 +CL04: The music fits the intended situation or place
31 +CL05: PwD leaves care home with caretaker
Icon XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Nice that you formulated upsides (+) and downsides (-). However, similar to the requirements: make one list of claims (with the up/downsides include in the claim spec, i.e. the trade-off is positive)
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2022-03-20 23:25:23.547