Nice that you formulated upsides and downsides . However, similar to the requirements: make one list of claims (with the up/downsides include in the claim spec, i.e. the trade-off is positive)
remove third claim (already removed. it was about bringing the PwD back to reality) maybe we can keep it but since it's not something that we could measure with out experiment, leave it as a future work
@Simran I think it might be best to remove cl05-07. They sound too much like things the robot does itself (ie requirements) and too little like what happens due to the robot
Project home
Nice that you formulated upsides
and downsides 
. However, similar to the requirements: make one list of claims (with the up/downsides include in the claim spec, i.e. the trade-off is positive)
remove third claim (already removed. it was about bringing the PwD back to reality)
maybe we can keep it but since it's not something that we could measure with out experiment, leave it as a future work
added claims CL05, CL06, and CL07 to align it with RQ03, RQ04, RQ06
TODO: Look for suitable papers for CL08, CL09 and CL10 as we cannot quantify them as per our current research.
@Simran I think it might be best to remove cl05-07. They sound too much like things the robot does itself (ie requirements) and too little like what happens due to the robot