Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version Icon 99.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:03
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 103.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:14
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -188,15 +188,11 @@
188 188  
189 189  We produced our results as interactive graphs. Only a printed version is shown below. To get a better version with more information (data point information on mouse hovering for instance), click the provided link for each graph.
190 190  
191 -
192 -
193 193  === Affect assessment ===
194 194  
195 -[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]]
193 +[[Affect assessment, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]]
196 196  [[image:mood.svg]]
197 -
198 -{{html}}
199 -<!DOCTYPE html>
195 +{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
200 200  <html>
201 201  <head>
202 202  <style>
... ... @@ -254,10 +254,8 @@
254 254  </table>
255 255  
256 256  </body>
257 -</html>
253 +</html>{{/html}}
258 258  
259 -{{/html}}
260 -
261 261  The hypothesis H0 is that Pepper does not have any effect. In this case, the questionnaires 1 and 2 should give the exact same values for each of the six feelings. However, the graphs and table below show that there is a slight increase regarding positive feelings, and a sligt decrease as well regarding negative feelings.
262 262  There are however many biases in these results. The main one that we isolated is that the activity of gardening itself could lead to the mood improvement. For this reason, we made subgroups based on whether the participants liked gardening or not.
263 263  
... ... @@ -329,12 +329,9 @@
329 329  
330 330  === System assessment ===
331 331  
332 -[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
326 +[[System assessment, first subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
333 333  [[image:group1.svg]]
334 -
335 -
336 -{{html}}
337 -<!DOCTYPE html>
328 +{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
338 338  <html>
339 339  <head>
340 340  <style>
... ... @@ -389,18 +389,14 @@
389 389  </table>
390 390  
391 391  </body>
392 -</html>
383 +</html>{{/html}}
393 393  
394 -{{/html}}
395 -
396 396  In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand.
397 397  
398 -[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
399 -[[image:group2.svg]]
400 400  
401 -
402 -{{html}}
403 -<!DOCTYPE html>
388 +[[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
389 +[[image:group2.svg]]
390 +{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
404 404  <html>
405 405  <head>
406 406  <style>
... ... @@ -449,18 +449,15 @@
449 449  </table>
450 450  
451 451  </body>
452 -</html>
439 +</html>{{/html}}
453 453  
454 -{{/html}}
455 -
456 456  The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree.
457 457  An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
458 458  
459 -[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
460 -[[image:group3.svg]]
461 461  
462 -{{html}}
463 -<!DOCTYPE html>
445 +[[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
446 +[[image:group3.svg]]
447 +{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
464 464  <html>
465 465  <head>
466 466  <style>
... ... @@ -509,18 +509,14 @@
509 509  </table>
510 510  
511 511  </body>
512 -</html>
496 +</html>{{/html}}
513 513  
514 -{{/html}}
515 -
516 516  The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening.
517 517  
518 -[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
519 -[[image:group4.svg]]
520 520  
521 -
522 -{{html}}
523 -<!DOCTYPE html>
501 +[[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
502 +[[image:group4.svg]]
503 +{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
524 524  <html>
525 525  <head>
526 526  <style>
... ... @@ -566,10 +566,8 @@
566 566  </table>
567 567  
568 568  </body>
569 -</html>
549 +</html>{{/html}}
570 570  
571 -{{/html}}
572 -
573 573  This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not.
574 574  
575 575  == Discussion ==
... ... @@ -592,14 +592,3 @@
592 592  From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
593 593  
594 594  We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.
595 -
596 -The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content.
597 -Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity.
598 -
599 -All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step.
600 -
601 -No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence.
602 -
603 -From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
604 -
605 -We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.