Changes for page Test
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version
98.1


edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:02
on 2022/04/03 14:02
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
97.1


edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 13:55
on 2022/04/03 13:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -186,12 +186,8 @@ 186 186 187 187 == Results == 188 188 189 - Weproducedour results asinteractive graphs. Only a printed versionis shownbelow. To getabetter version with moreinformation (data point information on mousehovering for instance), clicktheprovided link for each graph.189 +=== mood questionnaire results === 190 190 191 - 192 - 193 -=== Affect assessment === 194 - 195 195 [[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]] 196 196 [[image:mood.svg]] 197 197 ... ... @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ 220 220 <body> 221 221 222 222 <h5>Wilcoxon Signed-rank test</h5> 223 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution before and after the interaction with Pepper is the same .</h6>219 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution before and after the interaction with Pepper is the same</h6> 224 224 225 225 <table> 226 226 <tr> ... ... @@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ 258 258 259 259 {{/html}} 260 260 261 -The hypothesis H0 is that Pepper does not have any effect. In this case, the questionnaires 1 and 2 should give the exact same values for each of the six feelings. However, the graphs and table below show that there is a slight increase regarding positive feelings, and a sligt decrease as well regarding negative feelings. 262 -There are however many biases in these results. The main one that we isolated is that the activity of gardening itself could lead to the mood improvement. For this reason, we made subgroups based on whether the participants liked gardening or not. 263 263 264 264 {{html}} 265 265 <!DOCTYPE html> ... ... @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ 286 286 <body> 287 287 288 288 <h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 289 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution after the interaction with Pepper for people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>283 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution after the interaction with Pepper for people who like gardening and people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 290 290 291 291 <table> 292 292 <tr> ... ... @@ -324,11 +324,8 @@ 324 324 325 325 {{/html}} 326 326 327 - Wedid not notice anyrelevant pattern indicating asignificantdifferencebetween "like gardening"and "dislike gardening"groups. It seemso be that thisis not the cause of the mood improvement.321 +=== System questionnaire results === 328 328 329 - 330 -=== System assessment === 331 - 332 332 [[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]] 333 333 [[image:group1.svg]] 334 334 ... ... @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ 357 357 </head> 358 358 <body> 359 359 360 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 361 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>351 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 352 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 362 362 363 363 <table> 364 364 <tr> ... ... @@ -393,7 +393,6 @@ 393 393 394 394 {{/html}} 395 395 396 -In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand. 397 397 398 398 [[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]] 399 399 [[image:group2.svg]] ... ... @@ -423,8 +423,8 @@ 423 423 </head> 424 424 <body> 425 425 426 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 427 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>416 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 417 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 428 428 429 429 <table> 430 430 <tr> ... ... @@ -453,9 +453,6 @@ 453 453 454 454 {{/html}} 455 455 456 -The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. 457 -An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do. 458 - 459 459 [[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]] 460 460 [[image:group3.svg]] 461 461 ... ... @@ -483,8 +483,8 @@ 483 483 </head> 484 484 <body> 485 485 486 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 487 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>473 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 474 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 488 488 489 489 <table> 490 490 <tr> ... ... @@ -513,8 +513,6 @@ 513 513 514 514 {{/html}} 515 515 516 -The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening. 517 - 518 518 [[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]] 519 519 [[image:group4.svg]] 520 520 ... ... @@ -543,8 +543,8 @@ 543 543 </head> 544 544 <body> 545 545 546 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 547 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>531 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 532 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 548 548 549 549 <table> 550 550 <tr> ... ... @@ -570,8 +570,22 @@ 570 570 571 571 {{/html}} 572 572 573 -This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not. 574 574 559 + 560 +Since each PwD has its own state of dementia and personal issues, it is very difficult to get uniform results, especially since they are collected orally. 561 +Getting very nice, fully robust and reliable results, is merely a hope and a dream. 562 +However, we can try to consider the main trends that we are interested in. 563 +Thus, the results wil be mainly focused on: 564 +- How much autonomy did the PwD gain? 565 +→ what did the HCP, relatives and PwD report 566 +→ how many tasks did they perform that they didn't do previously 567 +→ did the relatives feel they had more time for themselves 568 +- Did their emotional state improve? 569 +→ feelings from the PwD themselves 570 +→ reports from relatives and HCP 571 +These results will most likely never be yes-no results, but more like clues or hints that show whether some things worked on not, which will be the point of our discussion. 572 +NB: This part explains what we expect as kind of results, it will be replaced by actual results after we perform an experiment with the class. There may also be interesting points we did not think about. 573 + 575 575 == Discussion == 576 576 577 577 * Reliability: Yes. One could replicate the same experiment with other patients. ... ... @@ -592,14 +592,3 @@ 592 592 From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished. 593 593 594 594 We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system. 595 - 596 -The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content. 597 -Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity. 598 - 599 -All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step. 600 - 601 -No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence. 602 - 603 -From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished. 604 - 605 -We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.