Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version Icon 97.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 13:55
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 95.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 13:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -77,8 +77,6 @@
77 77  
78 78  (Since this ideal evaluation has not been conducted, we do not have conclusions to be drawn.)
79 79  
80 -
81 -
82 82  = Feasible evaluation (students) =
83 83  
84 84  == Problem statement and research questions ==
... ... @@ -580,14 +580,3 @@
580 580  * Ecological validity: Yes. Since we compare "without Pepper" (BEFORE) and "with Pepper" (AFTER) in a similar environment (i.e., for everything but Pepper), the results are not dependent on the environment.
581 581  
582 582  == Conclusions ==
583 -
584 -The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content.
585 -Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity.
586 -
587 -All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step.
588 -
589 -No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence.
590 -
591 -From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
592 -
593 -We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.