Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.Mathieu
	1	+XWiki.PietroPiccini

Content

...	...	@@ -90,32 +90,17 @@
90	90	1. Does the prototype allow the PwD greater autonomy in their day-to-day life?
91	91	1. Does the prototype improve the emotional state of the PwD and their relatives?
92	92
93		-Based on these questions and our evaluation setting, we can evaluate some of our claims from our Claim page.
94		-
95		-1. CL01: The PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence.
96		-During the experiment, we can observe if this happens.
97		-1. CL02: The PwD feels understood.
98		-In the questionnaire, there are questions related to this.
99		-1. CL03: The PwD performs an activity step.
100		-We can verify this claim based on how far the participant went in the activity.
101		-1. CL08: The PwD feels accomplished.
102		-After the activity is done, there are two specific questions related to accomplishment.
103		-1. CL10: The PwD feels reassured.
104		-We can evaluate this from observing the participants, and from the affect questionnaire.
105		-1. CL11: The PwD feels content.
106		-There is a question related to this in the questionnaire.
107		-
108	108	== Method ==
109	109
110	110	In our situation, we recruit 20 students in our class to simulate the research. Since they are not real PwD, we ask them to act as if they were in home settings and we observe their behavior and expression. These data will also be reviewed after the evaluation to obtain the data and feedback.
111	111
112		-==== Questionnaires ====
	97	+==== Questionnairs ====
113	113
114		-In order to collect qualitative data, we prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire. All questionnaire questions are expressed in the form of statements and the participant can express one out of seven levels of agreement/disagreement from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the only exception being the additional remarks field at the end of the system assessment questionnaire.
	99	+In order to collect qualitative data, we have prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire. All questionnaire questions are expressed in the form of statements and the participant can express one out of 6 levels of agreement/disagreement from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the only exception being the additional remarks field at the end of the system assessment questionnaire.
115	115
116		-**Affect assessment**
	101	+**affect assessment**
117	117
118		-The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe their mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once right after. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant before the interaction with Pepper and after to study how Pepper influences the participant's feelings. The questionnaire has six questions each designed to measure the level of a certain feeling experienced at the moment of filling the questionnaire. The six feelings we take into consideration are evaluated from the following statements:
	103	+The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe his/her mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once right after. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant before the interaction with Pepper and after to study how Pepper influences the participant's feelings. The questionnaire has 6 questions each designed to measure the level of a certain feeling experienced at the moment of filling the questionnaire. The 6 feelings we take into consideration and evaluated from the following statements:
119	119
120	120	1. I feel sad
121	121	1. I feel content
...	...	@@ -124,10 +124,13 @@
124	124	1. I feel nervous
125	125	1. I feel caring
126	126
127		-**System assessment**
	112	+**system assessment**
128	128
129		-The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with Pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has fourteen questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
	114	+The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has 14 questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
130	130
	116	+
	117	+Questionnaire questions:
	118	+
131	131	1. I like gardening
132	132	1. I think Pepper made the task easier for me.
133	133	1. I would have known how to do the whole task without Pepper.
...	...	@@ -155,11 +155,11 @@
155	155
156	156	== Participants ==
157	157
158		-For this study, we simulate the real research by including 24 students from TU Delft. One third of them were female and two thirds male, so gender balance was decent. The students were not asked to roleplay someone with dementia, but simply to follow the experiment and do the activity.
	146	+For this study, we simulate the real research by including 20 students in our class. To avoid too much gender imbalance, there will be at least five men and five women. All participants will be asked to pretend to be a demented person and to make the simulation as real as possible.
159	159
160	160	== Experimental design ==
161	161
162		-Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiment tends to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same setting for every participant.
	150	+Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiments tend to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same home setting for every participant.
163	163
164	164	== Tasks ==
165	165