Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.haoranwang
	1	+XWiki.PietroPiccini

Content

...	...	@@ -90,70 +90,68 @@
90	90	1. Does the prototype allow the PwD greater autonomy in their day-to-day life?
91	91	1. Does the prototype improve the emotional state of the PwD and their relatives?
92	92
93		-Based on these questions and our evaluation setting, we can evaluate some of our claims from our Claim page.
94		-
95		-1. CL01: The PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence. PwD would know the presence of Pepper when Pepper starts to talk.
96		-1. CL02: The PwD feels understood. Whenever PwD says something, Pepper would respond. So, PwD feels understood.
97		-1. CL03: The PwD performs an activity step. In our evaluation, Pepper would guide PwD with a specific activity.
98		-1. CL08: The PwD feels accomplished. After the activity is done, we can evaluate the mood of the PwD to indicate the feeling of accomplishment.
99		-1. CL10: The PwD feels reassured. After PwD finishes each step, Pepper would wait for the response and give positive approval to the PwD.
100		-1. CL11: The PwD feels content. We can evaluate this with the data we collected from the questionnaire.
101		-
102	102	== Method ==
103	103
104	104	In our situation, we recruit 20 students in our class to simulate the research. Since they are not real PwD, we ask them to act as if they were in home settings and we observe their behavior and expression. These data will also be reviewed after the evaluation to obtain the data and feedback.
105	105
106		-==== Questionnaires ====
	97	+==== Questionnairs ====
107	107
108		-In order to collect qualitative data, we prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire. All questionnaire questions are expressed in the form of statements and the participant can express one out of seven levels of agreement/disagreement from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the only exception being the additional remarks field at the end of the system assessment questionnaire.
	99	+In order to collect qualitative data, we have prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire.
109	109
110		-**Affect assessment**
	101	+**affect assessment**
111	111
112		-The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe their mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once right after. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant before the interaction with Pepper and after to study how Pepper influences the participant's feelings. The questionnaire has six questions each designed to measure the level of a certain feeling experienced at the moment of filling the questionnaire. The six feelings we take into consideration are evaluated from the following statements:
	103	+The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe his/her mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once after. When compiling the questionnaire before the experiment the task that is taken as a reference is chosen by the participant based on his/her most common daily, challenging tasks. When doing the questionnaire after the interaction with Pepper the questions reference the task that has just been completed with Pepper. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant during a typical task with the feelings experienced during the task with Pepper. The questionnaire has 6 questions in total and they are s designed to answer research questions as listed below:
113	113
114		-1. I feel sad
115		-1. I feel content
116		-1. I feel calm
117		-1. I feel tired
118		-1. I feel nervous
119		-1. I feel caring
	105	+Questionnaire questions:
120	120
121		-**System assessment**
	107	+1. I felt frustrated by the difficulty of the task
	108	+1. I felt frustrated by the lack of help
	109	+1. I felt embarrassed by my ability to complete the task
	110	+1. I felt embarrassed when asking for help
	111	+1. The task was easier than usual
	112	+1. I enjoyed the task more than usual
122	122
123		-The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with Pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has fourteen questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
	114	+Research questions:
124	124
125		-1. I like gardening
126		-1. I think Pepper made the task easier for me.
127		-1. I would have known how to do the whole task without Pepper.
128		-1. Pepper was easy to understand.
129		-1. I enjoyed the task more than if I had had to do it alone.
130		-1. I am pleased that Pepper reminded me to do the activity.
131		-1. I feel like completing the task was a good accomplishment.
132		-1. I feel like I accomplished it myself.
133		-1. I felt in control of what I had to do.
134		-1. I felt annoyed by Pepper.
135		-1. I felt frustrated by the task.
136		-1. I felt pressured by Pepper.
137		-1. Pepper cared about helping me.
138		-1. I would trust Pepper with more important activities.
	116	+1. To what extent has Pepper improved the task's experience? [Questions: 1,2,3,4,5,6]
	117	+1. Did pepper make it easier to ask for help? [Questions: 2,4]
	118	+1. Did pepper make it easier to perform the task? [Questions: 1,5]
139	139
140		-Research questions:
	120	+**system assessment**
141	141
142		-1. To what extent did Pepper improve the task's experience? [Questions: 2,3,4,5,10,11,12]
143		-1. To what extent did Pepper improve the participant's autonomy and perception of control? [Questions: 6, 8, 9]
144		-1. To what extent did Pepper improve the participant's sense of accomplishment? [Questions: 7]
145		-1. Did the participant perceive Pepper as a social agent? [Questions: 13, 14]
146		-1. How was Pepper's ability to guide the participant through the task? [Questions: 4]
	122	+The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has 12 questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
147	147
148		-Question 1 is used to take into consideration the expected baseline enjoyment of the task for each participant.
149	149
	125	+Questionnaire questions:
	126	+
	127	+1. It was easy to understand each step from Pepper’s explanation
	128	+1. I would have preferred if Pepper divided the task into more, easier steps
	129	+1. The tablet images were very helpful for the task
	130	+1. I felt annoyed by Pepper’s explanations
	131	+1. I felt accomplished after completing the task
	132	+1. I felt that completing the task was my own accomplishment
	133	+1. The presence of Pepper made the task more enjoyable
	134	+1. I felt reassured that I could ask pepper to repeat the task
	135	+1. I felt pressured by Pepper to complete the task
	136	+1. I would trust pepper with more important tasks
	137	+1. I felt in control of the interaction with Pepper
	138	+1. I believed that pepper cared about helping me
	139	+
	140	+Research questions:
	141	+
	142	+1. To what extent did Pepper improve the task's experience? [Questions: 4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
	143	+1. To what extent did Pepper improve the participant's autonomy and perception of control? [Questions: 6, 11]
	144	+1. To what extent did Pepper improve the participant's sense of accomplishment? [Questions: 5]
	145	+1. Did the participant perceive Pepper as a social agent? [Questions: 7, 9, 12]
	146	+1. How was Pepper's ability to guide the participant through the task? [Questions: 1, 2, 3]
	147	+
150	150	== Participants ==
151	151
152		-For this study, we simulate the real research by including 24 students from TU Delft. One third of them were female and two thirds male, so gender balance was decent. The students were not asked to roleplay someone with dementia, but simply to follow the experiment and do the activity.
	150	+For this study, we simulate the real research by including 20 students in our class. To avoid too much gender imbalance, there will be at least five men and five women. All participants will be asked to pretend to be a demented person and to make the simulation as real as possible.
153	153
154	154	== Experimental design ==
155	155
156		-Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiment tends to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same setting for every participant.
	154	+Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiments tend to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same home setting for every participant.
157	157
158	158	== Tasks ==
159	159