Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.PietroPiccini
	1	+XWiki.haoranwang

Content

...	...	@@ -90,17 +90,26 @@
90	90	1. Does the prototype allow the PwD greater autonomy in their day-to-day life?
91	91	1. Does the prototype improve the emotional state of the PwD and their relatives?
92	92
	93	+Based on these questions and our evaluation setting, we can evaluate some of our claims from our Claim page.
	94	+
	95	+1. CL01: The PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence. PwD would know the presence of Pepper when Pepper starts to talk.
	96	+2. CL02: The PwD feels understood. Whenever PwD says something, Pepper would respond. So, PwD feels understood.
	97	+3. CL03: The PwD performs an activity step. In our evaluation, Pepper would guide PwD with a specific activity.
	98	+4. CL08: The PwD feels accomplished. After the activity is done, we can evaluate the mood of the PwD to indicate the feeling of accomplishment.
	99	+5. CL10: The PwD feels reassured. After PwD finishes each step, Pepper would wait for the response and give positive approval to the PwD.
	100	+6. CL11: The PwD feels content. We can evaluate this with the data we collected from the questionnaire.
	101	+
93	93	== Method ==
94	94
95	95	In our situation, we recruit 20 students in our class to simulate the research. Since they are not real PwD, we ask them to act as if they were in home settings and we observe their behavior and expression. These data will also be reviewed after the evaluation to obtain the data and feedback.
96	96
97		-==== Questionnairs ====
	106	+==== Questionnaires ====
98	98
99		-In order to collect qualitative data, we have prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire. All questionnaire questions are expressed in the form of statements and the participant can express one out of 6 levels of agreement/disagreement from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the only exception being the additional remarks field at the end of the system assessment questionnaire.
	108	+In order to collect qualitative data, we prepared two questionnaires to give to the participants: the affect assessment questionnaire and the system assessment questionnaire. All questionnaire questions are expressed in the form of statements and the participant can express one out of seven levels of agreement/disagreement from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the only exception being the additional remarks field at the end of the system assessment questionnaire.
100	100
101		-**affect assessment**
	110	+**Affect assessment**
102	102
103		-The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe his/her mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once right after. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant before the interaction with Pepper and after to study how Pepper influences the participant's feelings. The questionnaire has 6 questions each designed to measure the level of a certain feeling experienced at the moment of filling the questionnaire. The 6 feelings we take into consideration and evaluated from the following statements:
	112	+The affect assessment questionnaire asks the participant to describe their mood and feelings experienced during a task. The questionnaire is given two times: once before the experiments and once right after. The purpose of this questionnaire is to compare the feelings experienced by the participant before the interaction with Pepper and after to study how Pepper influences the participant's feelings. The questionnaire has six questions each designed to measure the level of a certain feeling experienced at the moment of filling the questionnaire. The six feelings we take into consideration are evaluated from the following statements:
104	104
105	105	1. I feel sad
106	106	1. I feel content
...	...	@@ -109,13 +109,10 @@
109	109	1. I feel nervous
110	110	1. I feel caring
111	111
112		-**system assessment**
	121	+**System assessment**
113	113
114		-The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has 14 questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
	123	+The system assessment questionnaire is given after the interaction with Pepper and its purpose is to assess the participant's experience with Pepper in more detail. The questionnaire has fourteen questions which are designed to answer research questions as described below:
115	115
116		-
117		-Questionnaire questions:
118		-
119	119	1. I like gardening
120	120	1. I think Pepper made the task easier for me.
121	121	1. I would have known how to do the whole task without Pepper.
...	...	@@ -143,11 +143,11 @@
143	143
144	144	== Participants ==
145	145
146		-For this study, we simulate the real research by including 20 students in our class. To avoid too much gender imbalance, there will be at least five men and five women. All participants will be asked to pretend to be a demented person and to make the simulation as real as possible.
	152	+For this study, we simulate the real research by including 24 students from TU Delft. One third of them were female and two thirds male, so gender balance was decent. The students were not asked to roleplay someone with dementia, but simply to follow the experiment and do the activity.
147	147
148	148	== Experimental design ==
149	149
150		-Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiments tend to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same home setting for every participant.
	156	+Since our evaluating process is relatively short, we use within-subject, which means each participant goes through all conditions. In this way, our experiment tends to have more statistical power and less variability. Furthermore, every PwD may have different issues in their day-to-day life, while also not having the same living conditions (alone, living with husband, family, etc), thus would require a different treatment. But in our setting, we use the same setting for every participant.
151	151
152	152	== Tasks ==
153	153