Changes for page Test

Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52

From version Icon 115.1 Icon
edited by Sneha Lodha
on 2022/04/04 00:36
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 114.6 Icon
edited by Sneha Lodha
on 2022/04/04 00:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -330,18 +330,12 @@
330 330  This confirms that PwDs can potentially benefit from a boost of energy from interacting with Pepper and, if the activity is enjoyable, a general improvement in contentness as well.
331 331  
332 332  
333 -=== System Assessment ===
333 +=== System assessment ===
334 334  
335 -**Task Guidance Assessment**
336 -[[System assessment, task guidance questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
337 -The results of the system questionnaire will be divided into four different group with similar questions in each group. This is done to improve the readability of the results and provide a more indepth analysis of various aspects of the system setup.
338 -
335 +[[System assessment, first subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
339 339  [[image:group1.svg]]
340 -Figure 2: Graphical representation of results for task guidance subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
337 +Figure 2: Graphical representation of results for system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
341 341  
342 -
343 -The first group, namely task guidance assessment, contains questions aimed at measuring how easy and pleasant was the activity when being guided by Pepper. The responses for this group are around the slightly agree line, a bit higher for the "Pepper was easy to understand" statement and a bit lower for the "I enjoyed the task more than if I had had to do it alone".
344 -
345 345  {{html}}
346 346  <!DOCTYPE html>
347 347  <html>
... ... @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@
370 370  
371 371  <table>
372 372   <tr>
373 - <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results</i></th>
367 + <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum reslts</i></th>
374 374   <th>I would have known how to do the whole task without Pepper.</th>
375 375   <th>I think Pepper made the task easier for me.</th>
376 376   <th>I enjoyed the task more than if I had had to do it alone.</th>
... ... @@ -400,16 +400,12 @@
400 400  </html>
401 401  {{/html}}
402 402  
403 -Table 3: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on task guidance subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
397 +In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand.
404 404  
405 405  
406 -**Accomplishment and Autonomy Assessment**
407 -[[System assessment, accomplishment and autonomy subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
400 +[[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
408 408  [[image:group2.svg]]
409 -Figure 3: Graphical representation of results for accomplishment and autonomy subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
410 410  
411 -The second group, namely the accomplishment and autonomy subset has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggestingthat it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task.
412 -
413 413  {{html}}
414 414  <!DOCTYPE html>
415 415  <html>
... ... @@ -434,11 +434,12 @@
434 434  </head>
435 435  <body>
436 436  
427 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5>
437 437  <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6>
438 438  
439 439  <table>
440 440   <tr>
441 - <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results </i></th>
432 + <th>test results </th>
442 442   <th>I feel like completing the task was a good accomplishment.</th>
443 443   <th>I feel like I accomplished it myself.</th>
444 444   <th>I felt in control of what I had to do.</th>
... ... @@ -462,19 +462,13 @@
462 462  </html>
463 463  {{/html}}
464 464  
465 -Table 4: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on accomplishment and autonomy subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
456 +The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree.
457 +An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
466 466  
467 467  
468 -The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
469 -
470 -
471 -**Negative Experiences Assessment**
472 -[[System assessment, negative experiences subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
460 +[[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
473 473  [[image:group3.svg]]
474 -Figure 4: Graphical representation of results for negative experiences subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
475 475  
476 -The third group, namely negative experiences subset is used to group together questions that measure negative feeling experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants.
477 -
478 478  {{html}}
479 479  <!DOCTYPE html>
480 480  <html>
... ... @@ -499,11 +499,12 @@
499 499  </head>
500 500  <body>
501 501  
487 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5>
502 502  <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6>
503 503  
504 504  <table>
505 505   <tr>
506 - <th><i> Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results </i></th>
492 + <th>test results </th>
507 507   <th>I felt annoyed by Pepper.</th>
508 508   <th>I felt frustrated by the task.</th>
509 509   <th>I felt pressured by Pepper.</th>
... ... @@ -527,19 +527,12 @@
527 527  </html>
528 528  {{/html}}
529 529  
530 -Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on negative experiences subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
531 -
532 -
533 533  The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening.
534 534  
535 535  
536 -**Social Assessment**
537 -[[System assessment, social subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
519 +[[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
538 538  [[image:group4.svg]]
539 -Figure 5: Graphical representation of results for social subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample.
540 540  
541 -The fourth and final group addresses a social subset and is utilized for assessing Pepper's social presence and trustworthiness as felt by the participants. The two statements used are "Pepper cared about helping me" and "I would trust Pepper with more important activities". The responses were on average slightly above the neutral level.
542 -
543 543  {{html}}
544 544  <!DOCTYPE html>
545 545  <html>
... ... @@ -564,11 +564,12 @@
564 564  </head>
565 565  <body>
566 566  
546 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5>
567 567  <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6>
568 568  
569 569  <table>
570 570   <tr>
571 - <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results</i></th>
551 + <th>test results </th>
572 572   <th>Pepper cared about helping me.</th>
573 573   <th>I would trust Pepper with more important activities.</th>
574 574   </tr>
... ... @@ -589,8 +589,6 @@
589 589  </html>
590 590  {{/html}}
591 591  
592 -Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on social subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening
593 -
594 594  This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not.
595 595  
596 596  == Discussion ==
... ... @@ -601,6 +601,28 @@
601 601  * Scope: The evaluation can be generalized to a larger scope, although with a lot of care, since the evaluation is not fully valid.
602 602  * Ecological validity: The evaluation is partially valid in terms of influence from the environment. The affect assessment questionnaire is the same before the activity and after, with the same environment, so the environment is technically not involved in this. However, the system assessment questionnaire does rely on some elements from the environment.
603 603  
582 +**Affect assessment questionnaire**
583 +
584 +We analyzed the participants' moods before and after the interaction with Pepper in order to be able to observe positive and negative changes that are caused by the interaction with Pepper. the results showed that, in general, there is a slight increase in positive moods and a slight decrease in negative moods. The Wilcoxon Signed-rank demonstrated that the only statistically significant change happened for contentness and tiredness based on a p-value threshold of 0.05.
585 +
586 +It is often the case that PwDs have to perform tasks that are not enjoyable for them such as taking medicines or performing routine activities. In order to analyze the difference in the mood change between people who liked the activity and people who didn't we divided into two groups and performed a Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. The results show that only the contentness mood shows a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
587 +This confirms that PwDs can potentially benefit from a boost of energy from interacting with Pepper and, if the activity is enjoyable, a general improvement in contentness as well.
588 +
589 +**system questionnaire**
590 +
591 +We divided the results from the system questionnaire into 4 separate groups containing similar questions as illustrated by the 4 different graphs above.
592 +
593 +The first group contains questions aimed at measuring how easy and pleasant was the activity when being guided by Pepper. The responses for this group are around the slightly agree line, a bit higher for the "Pepper was easy to understand" statement and a bit lower for the "I enjoyed the task more than if I had had to do it alone".
594 +
595 +The second group has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggesting
596 +that it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task.
597 +
598 +The third group is used to group together questions that measure negative experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants.
599 +
600 +The fourth and final group is for assessing Pepper's social presence and trustworthiness as felt by the participants. The two statements used are "Pepper cared about helping me" and "I would trust Pepper with more important activities". The responses were on average slightly above the neutral level.
601 +
602 +We performed a statistical test for the system questionnaire to see if the difference between the "like gardening" group and the "dislike gardening" group is significant in any of the questions. The results didn't show any statistical significance with the exception of the question "I would trust Pepper with more important activities" which showed that people who liked gardening were more likely to trust Pepper with more important activities.
603 +
604 604  **observations**
605 605  
606 606  Despite having on average good results, some participants still found Pepper frustrating or annoying. In order to understand what could have caused that we analyzed the video of the interaction and the feedback from the participants. We observed that when a participant felt frustrated was often due to Pepper's limitation. For example, sometimes Pepper would start listening too late missing part of the participant's answer. It is also common for the participant to say a word that Pepper is not able to understand which can result in the participant being stuck in a loop during the conversation which can be frustrating. We notice that in most of the experiments the experience and the ease of the interaction with Pepper improved as the participant learned how to interact with Pepper.