Changes for page Test
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version
114.8


edited by Sneha Lodha
on 2022/04/04 00:25
on 2022/04/04 00:25
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
115.1


edited by Sneha Lodha
on 2022/04/04 00:36
on 2022/04/04 00:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ 331 331 332 332 333 333 === System Assessment === 334 + 334 334 **Task Guidance Assessment** 335 335 [[System assessment, task guidance questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]] 336 336 The results of the system questionnaire will be divided into four different group with similar questions in each group. This is done to improve the readability of the results and provide a more indepth analysis of various aspects of the system setup. ... ... @@ -402,9 +402,13 @@ 402 402 Table 3: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on task guidance subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening 403 403 404 404 405 -[[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]] 406 +**Accomplishment and Autonomy Assessment** 407 +[[System assessment, accomplishment and autonomy subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]] 406 406 [[image:group2.svg]] 409 +Figure 3: Graphical representation of results for accomplishment and autonomy subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample. 407 407 411 +The second group, namely the accomplishment and autonomy subset has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggestingthat it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task. 412 + 408 408 {{html}} 409 409 <!DOCTYPE html> 410 410 <html> ... ... @@ -429,12 +429,11 @@ 429 429 </head> 430 430 <body> 431 431 432 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 433 433 <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6> 434 434 435 435 <table> 436 436 <tr> 437 - <th> testresults </th>441 + <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results </i></th> 438 438 <th>I feel like completing the task was a good accomplishment.</th> 439 439 <th>I feel like I accomplished it myself.</th> 440 440 <th>I felt in control of what I had to do.</th> ... ... @@ -458,13 +458,19 @@ 458 458 </html> 459 459 {{/html}} 460 460 461 -The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. 462 -An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do. 465 +Table 4: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on accomplishment and autonomy subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening 463 463 464 464 465 -[[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]] 468 +The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do. 469 + 470 + 471 +**Negative Experiences Assessment** 472 +[[System assessment, negative experiences subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]] 466 466 [[image:group3.svg]] 474 +Figure 4: Graphical representation of results for negative experiences subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample. 467 467 476 +The third group, namely negative experiences subset is used to group together questions that measure negative feeling experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants. 477 + 468 468 {{html}} 469 469 <!DOCTYPE html> 470 470 <html> ... ... @@ -489,12 +489,11 @@ 489 489 </head> 490 490 <body> 491 491 492 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 493 493 <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6> 494 494 495 495 <table> 496 496 <tr> 497 - <th> testresults </th>506 + <th><i> Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results </i></th> 498 498 <th>I felt annoyed by Pepper.</th> 499 499 <th>I felt frustrated by the task.</th> 500 500 <th>I felt pressured by Pepper.</th> ... ... @@ -518,12 +518,19 @@ 518 518 </html> 519 519 {{/html}} 520 520 530 +Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on negative experiences subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening 531 + 532 + 521 521 The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening. 522 522 523 523 524 -[[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]] 536 +**Social Assessment** 537 +[[System assessment, social subset, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]] 525 525 [[image:group4.svg]] 539 +Figure 5: Graphical representation of results for social subset of the system assessment, with results shown for people who like vs. dislike gardening, along with the average of the sample. 526 526 541 +The fourth and final group addresses a social subset and is utilized for assessing Pepper's social presence and trustworthiness as felt by the participants. The two statements used are "Pepper cared about helping me" and "I would trust Pepper with more important activities". The responses were on average slightly above the neutral level. 542 + 527 527 {{html}} 528 528 <!DOCTYPE html> 529 529 <html> ... ... @@ -548,12 +548,11 @@ 548 548 </head> 549 549 <body> 550 550 551 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 552 552 <h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do not like gardening is the same.</h6> 553 553 554 554 <table> 555 555 <tr> 556 - <th> testresults571 + <th><i>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum results</i></th> 557 557 <th>Pepper cared about helping me.</th> 558 558 <th>I would trust Pepper with more important activities.</th> 559 559 </tr> ... ... @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ 574 574 </html> 575 575 {{/html}} 576 576 592 +Table 5: Results of Wilcoxon Rank-Sum statistical test on social subset of system assessment for people who like vs. dislike gardening 593 + 577 577 This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not. 578 578 579 579 == Discussion == ... ... @@ -584,28 +584,6 @@ 584 584 * Scope: The evaluation can be generalized to a larger scope, although with a lot of care, since the evaluation is not fully valid. 585 585 * Ecological validity: The evaluation is partially valid in terms of influence from the environment. The affect assessment questionnaire is the same before the activity and after, with the same environment, so the environment is technically not involved in this. However, the system assessment questionnaire does rely on some elements from the environment. 586 586 587 -**Affect assessment questionnaire** 588 - 589 -We analyzed the participants' moods before and after the interaction with Pepper in order to be able to observe positive and negative changes that are caused by the interaction with Pepper. the results showed that, in general, there is a slight increase in positive moods and a slight decrease in negative moods. The Wilcoxon Signed-rank demonstrated that the only statistically significant change happened for contentness and tiredness based on a p-value threshold of 0.05. 590 - 591 -It is often the case that PwDs have to perform tasks that are not enjoyable for them such as taking medicines or performing routine activities. In order to analyze the difference in the mood change between people who liked the activity and people who didn't we divided into two groups and performed a Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. The results show that only the contentness mood shows a statistically significant difference between the two groups. 592 -This confirms that PwDs can potentially benefit from a boost of energy from interacting with Pepper and, if the activity is enjoyable, a general improvement in contentness as well. 593 - 594 -**system questionnaire** 595 - 596 -We divided the results from the system questionnaire into 4 separate groups containing similar questions as illustrated by the 4 different graphs above. 597 - 598 -The first group contains questions aimed at measuring how easy and pleasant was the activity when being guided by Pepper. The responses for this group are around the slightly agree line, a bit higher for the "Pepper was easy to understand" statement and a bit lower for the "I enjoyed the task more than if I had had to do it alone". 599 - 600 -The second group has questions concerning the sense of control and accomplishment felt during the task by the participants. The participants on average responded between slightly agree and agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment and that they felt in control while doing it and a bit lower for the statement "I feel like I have accomplished it myself" suggesting 601 -that it is possible for the participants to feel like Pepper is responsible, at least partially, for the accomplishment of the task. 602 - 603 -The third group is used to group together questions that measure negative experiences with Pepper. The results show that the participants on average answered between slightly disagree and disagreed. This suggests that Pepper was not frustrating for most people but only for a small fraction of the participants. 604 - 605 -The fourth and final group is for assessing Pepper's social presence and trustworthiness as felt by the participants. The two statements used are "Pepper cared about helping me" and "I would trust Pepper with more important activities". The responses were on average slightly above the neutral level. 606 - 607 -We performed a statistical test for the system questionnaire to see if the difference between the "like gardening" group and the "dislike gardening" group is significant in any of the questions. The results didn't show any statistical significance with the exception of the question "I would trust Pepper with more important activities" which showed that people who liked gardening were more likely to trust Pepper with more important activities. 608 - 609 609 **observations** 610 610 611 611 Despite having on average good results, some participants still found Pepper frustrating or annoying. In order to understand what could have caused that we analyzed the video of the interaction and the feedback from the participants. We observed that when a participant felt frustrated was often due to Pepper's limitation. For example, sometimes Pepper would start listening too late missing part of the participant's answer. It is also common for the participant to say a word that Pepper is not able to understand which can result in the participant being stuck in a loop during the conversation which can be frustrating. We notice that in most of the experiments the experience and the ease of the interaction with Pepper improved as the participant learned how to interact with Pepper.