Changes for page Test
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version 
112.1 
112.1
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 19:14
on 2022/04/03 19:14
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 111.1
111.1
edited by Pietro Piccini
on 2022/04/03 16:58
on 2022/04/03 16:58
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. Mathieu1 +XWiki.PietroPiccini - Content
-
... ... @@ -618,14 +618,4 @@ 618 618 619 619 From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished. 620 620 621 -We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. 622 - 623 -== Limitations == 624 - 625 -Although there seems to be a slight general trend that shows that our claim are satisfied, there are many limitations to take into account that reduce the significance of the results. 626 - 627 -1. Students are not the target group, and especially do not have any form of dementia. This means the effect is probably completely different on them than on actual patients. 628 -1. The evaluation is very generic and does not reflect one of our main functionalities, which is to have a customized agent for a PwD. 629 -1. Students are Master students at TUD. So they are all studying some field related to engineering. Most of them were even Computer Science students and/or students from the SCE class. This means they globally have a very different understanding and familiarity with robots compared to the rest of the population, causing a big bias in their interaction with Pepper. 630 -1. The explanation of Pepper was very short (around 1 min), so many participants had some difficulties interacting with Pepper in the beginning. It improved after some activity steps. 631 -1. Finally, our participants have good intentions and have a positive a priori on our experiment. Therefore, they are more likely to answer with positive results than if they did not know us at all. This again may cause a significant bias in their answers. 621 +We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.