Changes for page Test
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version
105.1


edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:17
on 2022/04/03 14:17
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
96.1


edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 13:39
on 2022/04/03 13:39
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -186,11 +186,9 @@ 186 186 187 187 == Results == 188 188 189 - Weproducedour results asinteractive graphs. Only a printed versionis shownbelow. To getabetter version with moreinformation (data point information on mousehovering for instance), clicktheprovided link for each graph.189 +=== mood questionnaire results === 190 190 191 -=== Affect assessment === 192 - 193 -[[Affect assessment, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]] 191 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]] 194 194 [[image:mood.svg]] 195 195 196 196 {{html}} ... ... @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ 218 218 <body> 219 219 220 220 <h5>Wilcoxon Signed-rank test</h5> 221 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution before and after the interaction with Pepper is the same .</h6>219 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution before and after the interaction with Pepper is the same</h6> 222 222 223 223 <table> 224 224 <tr> ... ... @@ -253,10 +253,9 @@ 253 253 254 254 </body> 255 255 </html> 254 + 256 256 {{/html}} 257 257 258 -The hypothesis H0 is that Pepper does not have any effect. In this case, the questionnaires 1 and 2 should give the exact same values for each of the six feelings. However, the graphs and table below show that there is a slight increase regarding positive feelings, and a sligt decrease as well regarding negative feelings. 259 -There are however many biases in these results. The main one that we isolated is that the activity of gardening itself could lead to the mood improvement. For this reason, we made subgroups based on whether the participants liked gardening or not. 260 260 261 261 {{html}} 262 262 <!DOCTYPE html> ... ... @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ 283 283 <body> 284 284 285 285 <h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 286 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution after the interaction with Pepper for people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>283 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The mood distribution after the interaction with Pepper for people who like gardening and people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 287 287 288 288 <table> 289 289 <tr> ... ... @@ -318,16 +318,15 @@ 318 318 319 319 </body> 320 320 </html> 318 + 321 321 {{/html}} 322 322 323 - Wedid not notice anyrelevant pattern indicating asignificantdifferencebetween "like gardening"and "dislike gardening"groups. It seemso be that thisis not the cause of the mood improvement.321 +=== System questionnaire results === 324 324 325 - 326 -=== System assessment === 327 - 328 -[[System assessment, first subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]] 323 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]] 329 329 [[image:group1.svg]] 330 330 326 + 331 331 {{html}} 332 332 <!DOCTYPE html> 333 333 <html> ... ... @@ -352,8 +352,8 @@ 352 352 </head> 353 353 <body> 354 354 355 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 356 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>351 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 352 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 357 357 358 358 <table> 359 359 <tr> ... ... @@ -385,14 +385,14 @@ 385 385 386 386 </body> 387 387 </html> 384 + 388 388 {{/html}} 389 389 390 -In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand. 391 391 392 - 393 -[[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]] 388 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]] 394 394 [[image:group2.svg]] 395 395 391 + 396 396 {{html}} 397 397 <!DOCTYPE html> 398 398 <html> ... ... @@ -417,8 +417,8 @@ 417 417 </head> 418 418 <body> 419 419 420 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 421 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>416 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 417 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 422 422 423 423 <table> 424 424 <tr> ... ... @@ -444,13 +444,10 @@ 444 444 445 445 </body> 446 446 </html> 443 + 447 447 {{/html}} 448 448 449 -The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree. 450 -An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do. 451 - 452 - 453 -[[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]] 446 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]] 454 454 [[image:group3.svg]] 455 455 456 456 {{html}} ... ... @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ 477 477 </head> 478 478 <body> 479 479 480 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 481 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>473 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 474 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 482 482 483 483 <table> 484 484 <tr> ... ... @@ -504,14 +504,13 @@ 504 504 505 505 </body> 506 506 </html> 500 + 507 507 {{/html}} 508 508 509 -The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening. 510 - 511 - 512 -[[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]] 503 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]] 513 513 [[image:group4.svg]] 514 514 506 + 515 515 {{html}} 516 516 <!DOCTYPE html> 517 517 <html> ... ... @@ -536,8 +536,8 @@ 536 536 </head> 537 537 <body> 538 538 539 -<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test</h5> 540 -<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of answers from people who like gardening and people who do ot like gardening is the same.</h6>531 +<h5>Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test test</h5> 532 +<h6><i>H0</i>: The distribution of the sytem's questionnaire answers from people who like gardening and form people who don't like gardening is the same</h6> 541 541 542 542 <table> 543 543 <tr> ... ... @@ -560,10 +560,25 @@ 560 560 561 561 </body> 562 562 </html> 555 + 563 563 {{/html}} 564 564 565 -This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not. 566 566 559 + 560 +Since each PwD has its own state of dementia and personal issues, it is very difficult to get uniform results, especially since they are collected orally. 561 +Getting very nice, fully robust and reliable results, is merely a hope and a dream. 562 +However, we can try to consider the main trends that we are interested in. 563 +Thus, the results wil be mainly focused on: 564 +- How much autonomy did the PwD gain? 565 +→ what did the HCP, relatives and PwD report 566 +→ how many tasks did they perform that they didn't do previously 567 +→ did the relatives feel they had more time for themselves 568 +- Did their emotional state improve? 569 +→ feelings from the PwD themselves 570 +→ reports from relatives and HCP 571 +These results will most likely never be yes-no results, but more like clues or hints that show whether some things worked on not, which will be the point of our discussion. 572 +NB: This part explains what we expect as kind of results, it will be replaced by actual results after we perform an experiment with the class. There may also be interesting points we did not think about. 573 + 567 567 == Discussion == 568 568 569 569 * Reliability: Yes. One could replicate the same experiment with other patients. ... ... @@ -573,14 +573,3 @@ 573 573 * Ecological validity: Yes. Since we compare "without Pepper" (BEFORE) and "with Pepper" (AFTER) in a similar environment (i.e., for everything but Pepper), the results are not dependent on the environment. 574 574 575 575 == Conclusions == 576 - 577 -The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content. 578 -Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity. 579 - 580 -All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step. 581 - 582 -No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence. 583 - 584 -From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished. 585 - 586 -We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.