Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version Icon 105.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 100.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:05
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@
253 253  
254 254  </body>
255 255  </html>
256 +
256 256  {{/html}}
257 257  
258 258  The hypothesis H0 is that Pepper does not have any effect. In this case, the questionnaires 1 and 2 should give the exact same values for each of the six feelings. However, the graphs and table below show that there is a slight increase regarding positive feelings, and a sligt decrease as well regarding negative feelings.
... ... @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@
318 318  
319 319  </body>
320 320  </html>
322 +
321 321  {{/html}}
322 322  
323 323  We did not notice any relevant pattern indicating a significant difference between "like gardening" and "dislike gardening" groups. It seems to be that this is not the cause of the mood improvement.
... ... @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@
328 328  [[System assessment, first subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
329 329  [[image:group1.svg]]
330 330  
333 +
331 331  {{html}}
332 332  <!DOCTYPE html>
333 333  <html>
... ... @@ -385,14 +385,15 @@
385 385  
386 386  </body>
387 387  </html>
391 +
388 388  {{/html}}
389 389  
390 390  In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand.
391 391  
392 -
393 393  [[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
394 394  [[image:group2.svg]]
395 395  
399 +
396 396  {{html}}
397 397  <!DOCTYPE html>
398 398  <html>
... ... @@ -444,12 +444,12 @@
444 444  
445 445  </body>
446 446  </html>
451 +
447 447  {{/html}}
448 448  
449 449  The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree.
450 450  An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
451 451  
452 -
453 453  [[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
454 454  [[image:group3.svg]]
455 455  
... ... @@ -504,14 +504,15 @@
504 504  
505 505  </body>
506 506  </html>
511 +
507 507  {{/html}}
508 508  
509 509  The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening.
510 510  
511 -
512 512  [[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
513 513  [[image:group4.svg]]
514 514  
519 +
515 515  {{html}}
516 516  <!DOCTYPE html>
517 517  <html>
... ... @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@
560 560  
561 561  </body>
562 562  </html>
568 +
563 563  {{/html}}
564 564  
565 565  This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not.
... ... @@ -584,3 +584,14 @@
584 584  From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
585 585  
586 586  We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.
593 +
594 +The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content.
595 +Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity.
596 +
597 +All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step.
598 +
599 +No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence.
600 +
601 +From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
602 +
603 +We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.