Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:52
From version Icon 104.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 99.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/03 14:03
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -188,11 +188,15 @@
188 188  
189 189  We produced our results as interactive graphs. Only a printed version is shown below. To get a better version with more information (data point information on mouse hovering for instance), click the provided link for each graph.
190 190  
191 +
192 +
191 191  === Affect assessment ===
192 192  
193 -[[Affect assessment, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]]
195 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/mood_questionnaire.html]]
194 194  [[image:mood.svg]]
195 -{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
197 +
198 +{{html}}
199 +<!DOCTYPE html>
196 196  <html>
197 197  <head>
198 198  <style>
... ... @@ -250,8 +250,10 @@
250 250  </table>
251 251  
252 252  </body>
253 -</html>{{/html}}
257 +</html>
254 254  
259 +{{/html}}
260 +
255 255  The hypothesis H0 is that Pepper does not have any effect. In this case, the questionnaires 1 and 2 should give the exact same values for each of the six feelings. However, the graphs and table below show that there is a slight increase regarding positive feelings, and a sligt decrease as well regarding negative feelings.
256 256  There are however many biases in these results. The main one that we isolated is that the activity of gardening itself could lead to the mood improvement. For this reason, we made subgroups based on whether the participants liked gardening or not.
257 257  
... ... @@ -323,9 +323,12 @@
323 323  
324 324  === System assessment ===
325 325  
326 -[[System assessment, first subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
332 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_1.html]]
327 327  [[image:group1.svg]]
328 -{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
334 +
335 +
336 +{{html}}
337 +<!DOCTYPE html>
329 329  <html>
330 330  <head>
331 331  <style>
... ... @@ -380,14 +380,18 @@
380 380  </table>
381 381  
382 382  </body>
383 -</html>{{/html}}
392 +</html>
384 384  
394 +{{/html}}
395 +
385 385  In this first system assessment graph, it is shown that participants slightly agree that Pepper made the task easier for them, and generally agree that she was easy to understand.
386 386  
387 -
388 -[[System assessment, second subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
398 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_2.html]]
389 389  [[image:group2.svg]]
390 -{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
400 +
401 +
402 +{{html}}
403 +<!DOCTYPE html>
391 391  <html>
392 392  <head>
393 393  <style>
... ... @@ -436,13 +436,14 @@
436 436  </table>
437 437  
438 438  </body>
439 -</html>{{/html}}
452 +</html>
440 440  
454 +{{/html}}
455 +
441 441  The sense of accomplishment is slightly higher for people who like gardening that for those who do not. It is globally around slightly agree.
442 442  An interesting fact to notice is that participants who do not like gardening felt more in control of what they had to do.
443 443  
444 -
445 -[[System assessment, third subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
459 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_3.html]]
446 446  [[image:group3.svg]]
447 447  
448 448  {{html}}
... ... @@ -496,14 +496,17 @@
496 496  
497 497  </body>
498 498  </html>
513 +
499 499  {{/html}}
500 500  
501 501  The participants globally disagree that the presence of Pepper annoyed, frustrated or pressured them. Those who like gardening actually had a bit more negative feelings regarding the presence of Pepper than those who dislike gardening.
502 502  
503 -
504 -[[System assessment, fourth subset of questions, interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
518 +[[interactive version>>https://pietro99.github.io/SCE/graphs/first_questionnaire_4.html]]
505 505  [[image:group4.svg]]
506 -{{html}}<!DOCTYPE html>
520 +
521 +
522 +{{html}}
523 +<!DOCTYPE html>
507 507  <html>
508 508  <head>
509 509  <style>
... ... @@ -549,8 +549,10 @@
549 549  </table>
550 550  
551 551  </body>
552 -</html>{{/html}}
569 +</html>
553 553  
571 +{{/html}}
572 +
554 554  This graph shows that the trust in Pepper was highly dependent on whether the participants enjoyed the activity or not.
555 555  
556 556  == Discussion ==
... ... @@ -573,3 +573,14 @@
573 573  From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
574 574  
575 575  We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.
595 +
596 +The results from the mood questionnaire seem to support our claims CL10: the PwD feels reassured and CL11: the PwD feels content.
597 +Although there are many potential biases, there seems to be a general trend which is that the mood of the participants slightly improved thanks to the activity.
598 +
599 +All participants, except one who asked to leave the experiment early, finished the whole activity we had prepared for them during the session. This means the participants were able to perform activity steps told by Pepper. This supports our claim CL03: the PwD performs an activity step.
600 +
601 +No participant failed to notice Pepper or did not hear what she was saying after the experiment had started. This supports our claim CL01: the PwD becomes aware of Pepper's presence.
602 +
603 +From the system assessment questionnaire, participants quite agree that completing the task was a good accomplishment for them. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels accomplished.
604 +
605 +We did not have any question explictly aimed at targeting our claim CL08. However, frustration, annoyance and pressure are often linked to a lack of understanding from the other part. We can combine these with the question about whether Pepper cared about helping the participants, and with our observations during the experiment. When aggregated together, it seems that generally speaking, the participants felt understood. This supports our claim CL08: the PwD feels understood. However, we did notice frustration a couple of times from the participants, because of Pepper's speech recognition system.