Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
26.2


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:36
on 2022/04/05 02:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
25.7


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:41
on 2022/04/05 01:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -21,12 +21,7 @@ 21 21 22 22 **Report** 23 23 24 -Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first draft version of: 25 -- Environment, 26 -- Stakeholders, 27 -- Problem scenario, 28 -- Objectives. 29 -- Defined a first use case. 24 +Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case. 30 30 31 31 32 32 ==== Week 2==== ... ... @@ -91,50 +91,45 @@ 91 91 92 92 **Managing** 93 93 94 -- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority 89 +- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority(not done, needs to be improved, fine but could be improved, done) and type (report, code, presentation). The idea of the list would be that everyone could access anytime the list of remaining things to work on, and could be updated by anyone. 95 95 - Asked tasks preferences of each team members. 96 96 - Provided description to each task. 97 97 - Helped individually three people to get on track with the project. 93 +- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline. 98 98 - Gave regularly feedback about the report on XWiki. 99 99 100 100 **Report** 101 -- Wrote the a first version of the inclusive design page. 102 -- Implemented the feedback from the presentation about the team design patterns 103 103 98 +- Implemented the feedback from the presentation: 99 + - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns 100 + - 101 + 104 104 ==== Week 7==== 105 105 106 106 **Managing** 107 -- Read every section of the report and providing constructive feedback. 108 -- Updated the list of tasks. 109 -- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline. 110 110 106 +- Ontology 107 +- Design pattern 108 + 111 111 **Report** 112 112 113 -- Wrote the a first version of the Human-Agent Teamwork page. 114 -- Implemented feedback that we received from the professors on roughly every tab of the wiki: Foundation, Specification, Evaluation, Design Pattern. 115 -- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 116 - 117 -__With Sneha:__ 111 +I worked on the report with Sneha on the following tasks: 118 118 - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims. 119 -- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP. 120 120 - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 121 121 - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors 122 - 115 +- Implemented feedback that we received from the professors on roughly every tab of the wiki: Foundation, Specification, Evaluation, Design Pattern. 116 +- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 123 123 124 124 **Experiments** 125 125 126 -- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process. 127 -- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes. 128 -- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday. 129 -- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups. 120 +Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms 130 130 131 131 ==== Week 8==== 132 132 133 133 **Managing** 134 -- Providing constructive feedback to team members about every component. 135 -- Updated the list of tasks. 136 -- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline. 137 137 126 + 127 + 138 138 **Report** 139 139 140 140 - Created, designed, wrote the Graphical User Interface section and visuals. As it was some feedback from the professors from our presentation, I thought it would be a nice addition to describe the work we have done concerning the GUI. ... ... @@ -141,9 +141,7 @@ 141 141 - Humanoid Robot: As some feedback given on this page by group members has not been implemented in more than 2 weeks, I took the liberty to completely rework this section. 142 142 - Implemented the feedback of the professors about the Ontology based on some literature. 143 143 - Adjusted the Introduction. 144 -- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing (Including research). 145 -- Made some analysis about the data we collected for our results. 146 -- Explored different visuals for displaying the results 134 +- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing. 147 147 - Proof-read the entire report iteratively as we improved sections repeatedly. 148 148 - Gave some constructive feedback about 90% of the sections on the Xwiki or by group messages. 149 149 - Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections about aesthetics and structure. ... ... @@ -151,6 +151,4 @@ 151 151 - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages). 152 152 153 153 == Personal Reflections== 154 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree. 155 155 156 -On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to unmotivated individuals, it had very little effect on them. This results in a very unfair repartition of work as half of the team overworked as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product and report.