Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37

From version Icon 25.9 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 27.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -21,7 +21,12 @@
21 21  
22 22  **Report**
23 23  
24 -Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
24 +Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first draft version of:
25 +- Environment,
26 +- Stakeholders,
27 +- Problem scenario,
28 +- Objectives.
29 +- Defined a first use case.
25 25  
26 26  
27 27  ==== Week 2====
... ... @@ -90,22 +90,19 @@
90 90  - Asked tasks preferences of each team members.
91 91  - Provided description to each task.
92 92  - Helped individually three people to get on track with the project.
93 -- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
94 94  - Gave regularly feedback about the report on XWiki.
95 95  
96 96  **Report**
97 97  - Wrote the a first version of the inclusive design page.
98 -- Implemented the feedback from the presentation:
99 - - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns
100 - -
102 +- Implemented the feedback from the presentation about the team design patterns
101 101  
102 102  ==== Week 7====
103 103  
104 104  **Managing**
107 +- Read every section of the report and providing constructive feedback.
108 +- Updated the list of tasks.
109 +- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
105 105  
106 -- Ontology
107 -- Design pattern
108 -
109 109  **Report**
110 110  
111 111  - Wrote the a first version of the Human-Agent Teamwork page.
... ... @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
114 114  
115 115  __With Sneha:__
116 116  - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims.
119 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP.
117 117  - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
118 118  - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors
119 119  
... ... @@ -120,14 +120,18 @@
120 120  
121 121  **Experiments**
122 122  
123 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms
126 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process.
127 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes.
128 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
129 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups.
124 124  
125 125  ==== Week 8====
126 126  
127 127  **Managing**
134 +- Providing constructive feedback to team members about every component.
135 +- Updated the list of tasks.
136 +- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
128 128  
129 -
130 -
131 131  **Report**
132 132  
133 133  - Created, designed, wrote the Graphical User Interface section and visuals. As it was some feedback from the professors from our presentation, I thought it would be a nice addition to describe the work we have done concerning the GUI.
... ... @@ -134,7 +134,9 @@
134 134  - Humanoid Robot: As some feedback given on this page by group members has not been implemented in more than 2 weeks, I took the liberty to completely rework this section.
135 135  - Implemented the feedback of the professors about the Ontology based on some literature.
136 136  - Adjusted the Introduction.
137 -- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing.
144 +- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing (Including research).
145 +- Made some analysis about the data we collected for our results.
146 +- Explored different visuals for displaying the results
138 138  - Proof-read the entire report iteratively as we improved sections repeatedly.
139 139  - Gave some constructive feedback about 90% of the sections on the Xwiki or by group messages.
140 140  - Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections about aesthetics and structure.
... ... @@ -142,4 +142,6 @@
142 142  - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages).
143 143  
144 144  == Personal Reflections==
154 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree.
145 145  
156 +On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to unmotivated individuals, it had very little effect on them. This results in a very unfair repartition of work as half of the team overworked as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product and report.