Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37

From version Icon 25.8 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 25.12 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
86 86  
87 87  **Managing**
88 88  
89 -- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority(not done, needs to be improved, fine but could be improved, done) and type (report, code, presentation). The idea of the list would be that everyone could access anytime the list of remaining things to work on, and could be updated by anyone.
89 +- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority (not done, needs to be improved, fine but could be improved, done) and type (report, code, presentation). The idea of the list would be that everyone could access anytime the list of remaining things to work on, and could be updated by anyone.
90 90  - Asked tasks preferences of each team members.
91 91  - Provided description to each task.
92 92  - Helped individually three people to get on track with the project.
... ... @@ -95,16 +95,12 @@
95 95  
96 96  **Report**
97 97  - Wrote the a first version of the inclusive design page.
98 -- Implemented the feedback from the presentation:
99 - - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns
100 - -
98 +- Implemented the feedback from the presentation about the team design patterns
101 101  
102 102  ==== Week 7====
103 103  
104 104  **Managing**
105 105  
106 -- Ontology
107 -- Design pattern
108 108  
109 109  **Report**
110 110  
... ... @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
114 114  
115 115  __With Sneha:__
116 116  - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims.
113 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP.
117 117  - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
118 118  - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors
119 119  
... ... @@ -120,7 +120,10 @@
120 120  
121 121  **Experiments**
122 122  
123 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms
120 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process.
121 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes.
122 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
123 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups.
124 124  
125 125  ==== Week 8====
126 126  
... ... @@ -134,7 +134,9 @@
134 134  - Humanoid Robot: As some feedback given on this page by group members has not been implemented in more than 2 weeks, I took the liberty to completely rework this section.
135 135  - Implemented the feedback of the professors about the Ontology based on some literature.
136 136  - Adjusted the Introduction.
137 -- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing.
137 +- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing (Including research).
138 +- Made some analysis about the data we collected for our results.
139 +- Explored different visuals for displaying the results
138 138  - Proof-read the entire report iteratively as we improved sections repeatedly.
139 139  - Gave some constructive feedback about 90% of the sections on the Xwiki or by group messages.
140 140  - Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections about aesthetics and structure.
... ... @@ -142,4 +142,7 @@
142 142  - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages).
143 143  
144 144  == Personal Reflections==
147 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and
148 +The iterative process nature of this class makes it very
145 145  
150 +A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is