Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
25.7


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:41
on 2022/04/05 01:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
25.10


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:52
on 2022/04/05 01:52
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ 86 86 87 87 **Managing** 88 88 89 -- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority(not done, needs to be improved, fine but could be improved, done) and type (report, code, presentation). The idea of the list would be that everyone could access anytime the list of remaining things to work on, and could be updated by anyone. 89 +- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online. The list was organised by both priority (not done, needs to be improved, fine but could be improved, done) and type (report, code, presentation). The idea of the list would be that everyone could access anytime the list of remaining things to work on, and could be updated by anyone. 90 90 - Asked tasks preferences of each team members. 91 91 - Provided description to each task. 92 92 - Helped individually three people to get on track with the project. ... ... @@ -94,11 +94,9 @@ 94 94 - Gave regularly feedback about the report on XWiki. 95 95 96 96 **Report** 97 +- Wrote the a first version of the inclusive design page. 98 +- Implemented the feedback from the presentation about the team design patterns 97 97 98 -- Implemented the feedback from the presentation: 99 - - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns 100 - - 101 - 102 102 ==== Week 7==== 103 103 104 104 **Managing** ... ... @@ -108,12 +108,15 @@ 108 108 109 109 **Report** 110 110 111 -I worked on the report with Sneha on the following tasks: 109 +- Wrote the a first version of the Human-Agent Teamwork page. 110 +- Implemented feedback that we received from the professors on roughly every tab of the wiki: Foundation, Specification, Evaluation, Design Pattern. 111 +- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 112 + 113 +__With Sneha:__ 112 112 - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims. 113 113 - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 114 114 - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors 115 -- Implemented feedback that we received from the professors on roughly every tab of the wiki: Foundation, Specification, Evaluation, Design Pattern. 116 -- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 117 + 117 117 118 118 **Experiments** 119 119 ... ... @@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ 131 131 - Humanoid Robot: As some feedback given on this page by group members has not been implemented in more than 2 weeks, I took the liberty to completely rework this section. 132 132 - Implemented the feedback of the professors about the Ontology based on some literature. 133 133 - Adjusted the Introduction. 134 -- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing. 135 +- Added citations to the pages that needed sourcing (Including research). 136 +- Made some analysis about the data we collected for our results. 137 +- Explored different visuals for displaying the results 135 135 - Proof-read the entire report iteratively as we improved sections repeatedly. 136 136 - Gave some constructive feedback about 90% of the sections on the Xwiki or by group messages. 137 137 - Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections about aesthetics and structure. ... ... @@ -139,4 +139,7 @@ 139 139 - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages). 140 140 141 141 == Personal Reflections== 145 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and 146 +The iterative process nature of this class makes it very 142 142 148 +A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is