Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
25.2


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:04
on 2022/04/05 01:04
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
20.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/21 22:42
on 2022/03/21 22:42
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -3,110 +3,65 @@ 3 3 **Secondly**, I already took a lot of theoretical courses and it was important for me to do a course that has an important social impact. 4 4 **Lastly**, as my grandmother just got diagnosed a brain tumour this summer and as I saw her cognitive abilities degrease week by week, it was very special for me to work on a project that targeted people with dementia. 5 5 6 -==== Week 1==== 6 +==== Week 1 ==== 7 7 Since the goal of this project is to develop a prototype that meets a real life need. The field of knowledge is very wide ranging from the types of dementia, and the needs of these people, to the type of activities they want to engage in, to the technologies available to help them. 8 8 We decided to divide each of these tasks among the six group members. The idea being that each person will do in-depth research in one of the areas and can present it to the group for the weekend. This way the whole group will be proficient on the topic as a whole. 9 9 10 -**Research** 11 11 I chose to work on two aspects: 12 - __Location of PwD:__11 +**Location of PwD:** 13 13 I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificities of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home. 14 14 15 - __Interaction Goals:__14 +**Interaction Goals:** 16 16 I researched the needs of people with dementia. I identified three types of goals the chosen robot could fulfil: functional, emotional, and safety. 17 17 I listed 5 to 10 potential use cases per goal that I found to be either the most important or very original and not already fulfil. 18 18 19 19 Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose. 20 20 21 -**Report** 22 -Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case. 20 +==== Week 2==== 21 +We splitted the tea 22 +- Personas 23 23 24 24 25 -==== Week 2==== 26 -We splitted the team in two subteams. Sneha and I would work on the report while the rest of the group would work on the code. 27 -The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas. 28 -Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia. 29 29 30 -Sneha and I defined based on this worked on 31 -**Report & Design** 32 -- Defining the personas 33 -We improved the report by writing a first draft of the following sections: 34 -- Objectives. 35 -- Claims 36 -- 37 37 ==== Week 3==== 38 - Eventhough we wanted toswitch rolesweek by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the codeand the report we didn't asweaccumulated a bit of work from the previousweek in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and explored the general potential goals of the robot.27 +- Use cases 39 39 40 -**Report & Design** 41 -- We defined the use cases and described the steps sequence of each one of them. 42 -- We redefined our goals according to the limitations of Pepper. 43 -- We defined a first series of requirements. 44 44 30 + 45 45 ==== Week 4==== 46 -This week I worked again mainly on the report with Sneha. 32 +- Design Patterns 33 +- Ontology 47 47 48 -**Report** 49 -- Designed the team design patterns and drew it. 50 -- Ontology. Designed the ontology. Sneha drew it. 51 -- Requirements 52 -- Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections. 53 53 54 54 55 55 ==== Week 5==== 56 -**Report** 57 -- Defined the claims. 58 -- Redefined most of the requirements and described all the features. 59 -- Redefined the Use cases according to the new claims and requirements. 60 -- Reorganised the objectives and made minor edits. 61 -- Wrote a first version of the Music Management page. 62 -- Provided some feedback about the evaluation and gave some input about the evaluation process. 63 - 64 -**Presentation** 65 -This week as Pietro was contact case one day before the presentation, I had to replace him for the presentation. 66 -- Make every slides that I presented (as nothing was ready before). 67 -- Write the text of my presentation (as nothing was ready before). 68 -- Give feedback about slides of other speakers 38 +PRESENTATION: 69 69 - 70 -I had to write every slides that I would present as well as the text as nothing was prepared in advance. 71 -We rehearsed with Mathieu and Manolo before the presentation. 72 -We presented in front of the class. 40 +REPORT: 41 +- Claims 42 +- Requirements 43 +- Objectives 73 73 45 +I also provided some feedback about 74 74 47 + 48 + 75 75 ==== Week 6==== 76 -As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this project needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position. 77 -**Managing** 78 -- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online that with level of emergency to complete t 79 -- Asked preferences of each team members to complete the task 80 -- Provided description to each task 81 -- Helped individually person to get on track with the project 82 -- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline. 83 -As some people didn't participate much in 84 -- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 85 85 86 -**Report** 87 -- Implemented the feedback from the presentation: 88 - - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns 89 - - 51 + 52 + 90 90 ==== Week 7==== 91 -**Managing** 92 92 - Ontology 93 93 - Design pattern 94 94 95 -**With SNEHA** 96 -- 97 -Use cases: 98 -- We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and 99 -- We updated the claims according to the feedback and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 100 100 101 -- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 102 102 103 103 ==== Week 8==== 104 -**Managing** 105 105 106 106 107 107 108 108 109 -- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki. 110 110 111 111 == Personal Reflections== 112 112 67 +