Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
25.13


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:29
on 2022/04/05 02:29
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
25.10


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:52
on 2022/04/05 01:52
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ 101 101 102 102 **Managing** 103 103 104 +- Ontology 105 +- Design pattern 104 104 105 105 **Report** 106 106 ... ... @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ 110 110 111 111 __With Sneha:__ 112 112 - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims. 113 -- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP. 114 114 - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 115 115 - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors 116 116 ... ... @@ -117,10 +117,7 @@ 117 117 118 118 **Experiments** 119 119 120 -- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process. 121 -- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes. 122 -- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday. 123 -- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups. 121 +Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms 124 124 125 125 ==== Week 8==== 126 126 ... ... @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ 144 144 - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages). 145 145 146 146 == Personal Reflections== 147 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree. 145 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and 146 +The iterative process nature of this class makes it very 148 148 149 - Onanother note, asignificative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members.148 +A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is