Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -21,7 +21,12 @@
21	21
22	22	**Report**
23	23
24		-Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
	24	+Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first draft version of:
	25	+- Environment,
	26	+- Stakeholders,
	27	+- Problem scenario,
	28	+- Objectives.
	29	+- Defined a first use case.
25	25
26	26
27	27	==== Week 2====
...	...	@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@
90	90	- Asked tasks preferences of each team members.
91	91	- Provided description to each task.
92	92	- Helped individually three people to get on track with the project.
93		-- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
94	94	- Gave regularly feedback about the report on XWiki.
95	95
96	96	**Report**
...	...	@@ -100,10 +100,10 @@
100	100	==== Week 7====
101	101
102	102	**Managing**
	107	+- Read every section of the report and providing constructive feedback.
	108	+- Updated the list of tasks.
	109	+- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
103	103
104		-- Ontology
105		-- Design pattern
106		-
107	107	**Report**
108	108
109	109	- Wrote the a first version of the Human-Agent Teamwork page.
...	...	@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
112	112
113	113	__With Sneha:__
114	114	- Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims.
	119	+- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP.
115	115	- Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
116	116	- Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors
117	117
...	...	@@ -118,14 +118,18 @@
118	118
119	119	**Experiments**
120	120
121		-Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms
	126	+- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process.
	127	+- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes.
	128	+- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
	129	+- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups.
122	122
123	123	==== Week 8====
124	124
125	125	**Managing**
	134	+- Providing constructive feedback to team members about every component.
	135	+- Updated the list of tasks.
	136	+- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
126	126
127		-
128		-
129	129	**Report**
130	130
131	131	- Created, designed, wrote the Graphical User Interface section and visuals. As it was some feedback from the professors from our presentation, I thought it would be a nice addition to describe the work we have done concerning the GUI.
...	...	@@ -142,7 +142,6 @@
142	142	- Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages).
143	143
144	144	== Personal Reflections==
145		-In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and
146		-The iterative process nature of this class makes it very
	154	+In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree.
147	147
148		-A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is
	156	+On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to unmotivated individuals, it had very little effect on them. This results in a very unfair repartition of work as half of the team overworked as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product and report.