Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
25.11


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:06
on 2022/04/05 02:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
25.16


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:33
on 2022/04/05 02:33
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ 101 101 102 102 **Managing** 103 103 104 -- Ontology 105 -- Design pattern 106 106 107 107 **Report** 108 108 ... ... @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ 112 112 113 113 __With Sneha:__ 114 114 - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims. 113 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP. 115 115 - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 116 116 - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors 117 117 ... ... @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ 118 118 119 119 **Experiments** 120 120 121 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms 120 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process. 121 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes. 122 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday. 123 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups. 122 122 123 123 ==== Week 8==== 124 124 ... ... @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ 142 142 - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages). 143 143 144 144 == Personal Reflections== 145 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and 146 -The iterative process nature of this class makes it very 147 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree. 147 147 148 - Asignificative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members.Itreallyfeltlike twogroupsofpeople emergedweeks afterweekshefact.that the entiregradeis149 +On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to unmotivated individuals, it had very little effect on them. This results in a very unfair repartition of work as half of the team overworked as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product and report.