Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37

From version Icon 25.10 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 25.15 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@
101 101  
102 102  **Managing**
103 103  
104 -- Ontology
105 -- Design pattern
106 106  
107 107  **Report**
108 108  
... ... @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
112 112  
113 113  __With Sneha:__
114 114  - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims.
113 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP.
115 115  - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
116 116  - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors
117 117  
... ... @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@
118 118  
119 119  **Experiments**
120 120  
121 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms
120 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process.
121 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes.
122 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
123 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups.
122 122  
123 123  ==== Week 8====
124 124  
... ... @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@
142 142  - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages).
143 143  
144 144  == Personal Reflections==
145 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and
146 -The iterative process nature of this class makes it very
147 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree.
147 147  
148 -A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is
149 +On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to unmotivated individuals, it had very little effect on them. This results in a very unfair repartition of work as half of the team overworked as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product.