Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37

From version Icon 25.10 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 25.14 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@
101 101  
102 102  **Managing**
103 103  
104 -- Ontology
105 -- Design pattern
106 106  
107 107  **Report**
108 108  
... ... @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
112 112  
113 113  __With Sneha:__
114 114  - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims.
113 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP.
115 115  - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
116 116  - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors
117 117  
... ... @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@
118 118  
119 119  **Experiments**
120 120  
121 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms
120 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process.
121 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes.
122 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday.
123 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups.
122 122  
123 123  ==== Week 8====
124 124  
... ... @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@
142 142  - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages).
143 143  
144 144  == Personal Reflections==
145 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and
146 -The iterative process nature of this class makes it very
147 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree.
147 147  
148 -A significative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members. It really felt like two groups of people emerged weeks after weekshe fact.that the entire grade is
149 +On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to them, it had very little effect on them. This results in half of the team having overworked on the project as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product.