Changes for page Pierre Bongrand
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version
25.10


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 01:52
on 2022/04/05 01:52
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
25.14


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/04/05 02:32
on 2022/04/05 02:32
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ 101 101 102 102 **Managing** 103 103 104 -- Ontology 105 -- Design pattern 106 106 107 107 **Report** 108 108 ... ... @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ 112 112 113 113 __With Sneha:__ 114 114 - Use cases: We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and Claims. 113 +- Team Design Pattern: Modified the visuals to make it work with the IDP. 115 115 - Claims: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well 116 116 - Requirements: We updated the claims according to the feedback provided by the professors 117 117 ... ... @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ 118 118 119 119 **Experiments** 120 120 121 -Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms 120 +- Gave extensive repeated feedback about the questionnaire, its style and experiment process. 121 +- Mathieu and I corrected the evaluation forms as there were some mistakes. 122 +- Did 15 evaluation sessions on Monday, Thursday and Friday. 123 +- Participated in 3 experiments of other groups. 122 122 123 123 ==== Week 8==== 124 124 ... ... @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ 142 142 - Improved and adapted the general aesthetic of the pages to the export features of XWiki (because export feature changes the nature of the webpages). 143 143 144 144 == Personal Reflections== 145 -In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really interesting and 146 -The iterative process nature of this class makes it very 147 +In general I really enjoyed working on this project. I found the lectures to be really interesting. The guest lecturers were really a nice addition and gave some very valuable insights. The iterative process of the project was a great pedagogical experience. Moreover, contributing in a practical way to a societal problem felt very nice and gave me some perspective about how I will use my knowledge after this degree. 147 147 148 - Asignificative downside of this project was the lack of motivation of a few team members.Itreallyfelt like twogroups ofpeopleemergedweeksafterweekshefact.that the entiregradeis149 +On another note, a significative downside of this project was the severe lack of motivation of a few team members. Even though help and reminders were provided to them, it had very little effect on them. This results in half of the team having overworked on the project as we were passionated by the project and wanted to deliver a nice and finished product.