Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -7,16 +7,18 @@
7	7	Since the goal of this project is to develop a prototype that meets a real life need. The field of knowledge is very wide ranging from the types of dementia, and the needs of these people, to the type of activities they want to engage in, to the technologies available to help them.
8	8	We decided to divide each of these tasks among the six group members. The idea being that each person will do in-depth research in one of the areas and can present it to the group for the weekend. This way the whole group will be proficient on the topic as a whole.
9	9
	10	+**Research**
10	10	I chose to work on two aspects:
11		-**Location of PwD:**
	12	+__Location of PwD:__
12	12	I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificities of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
13	13
14		-**Interaction Goals:**
	15	+__Interaction Goals:__
15	15	I researched the needs of people with dementia. I identified three types of goals the chosen robot could fulfil: functional, emotional, and safety.
16	16	I listed 5 to 10 potential use cases per goal that I found to be either the most important or very original and not already fulfil.
17	17
18	18	Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose.
19	19
	21	+**Report**
20	20	Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
21	21
22	22
...	...	@@ -25,59 +25,86 @@
25	25	The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas.
26	26	Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia.
27	27
28		-Sneha and I defined based on this decision three personas:
29		-- Annabelle a 36 years old women with early stage of vascular dementia.
30		-- Charles a 80 years old man with mild dementia.
31		-- Lucy a healthcare person.
32		-
33		-We made some notes about it and only wrote it in the xWiki the beginning of the following week.
34		-
35		-We improved the report by editing the following sections:
36		-- Objectives. We modified our objectives and categorised them in two categories: Increase the life span and Improve quality of life.
	30	+Sneha and I defined based on this worked on
	31	+**Report & Design**
	32	+- Defining the personas
	33	+We improved the report by writing a first draft of the following sections:
	34	+- Objectives.
	35	+- Claims
37	37	-
38	38	==== Week 3====
39		-Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and the general goals of the robot.
	38	+Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and explored the general potential goals of the robot.
40	40
41		-We mainly worked on the use cases which was a considerable load of work.
42		-As the "technical" subteam gave us some feedback on what was feasible, Sneha and I precised the feasible objectives and came up with 4 different use cases.
43		-We defined these use cases,
	40	+**Report & Design**
	41	+- We defined the use cases and described the steps sequence of each one of them.
	42	+- We redefined our goals according to the limitations of Pepper.
	43	+- We defined a first series of requirements.
44	44
45		-
46	46	==== Week 4====
47		-- Design Patterns
48		-- Ontology
49		-- Specification->Functions.
	46	+This week I worked again mainly on the report with Sneha.
50	50
51		-Requirement
52		-
53		-==== Week 5====
54		-PRESENTATION:
55		--
56		-REPORT:
57		-- Claims
	48	+**Report**
	49	+- Designed the team design patterns and drew it.
	50	+- Ontology. Designed the ontology. Sneha drew it.
58	58	- Requirements
59		-- Objectives
60		-- Music Management
	52	+- Analysed other group's work report and made minor edits to few sections.
61	61
62		-I also provided some feedback about the evaluation. The evaluation was first in an ideal setup, and after
63	63
	55	+==== Week 5====
	56	+**Report**
	57	+- Defined the claims.
	58	+- Redefined most of the requirements and described all the features.
	59	+- Redefined the Use cases according to the new claims and requirements.
	60	+- Reorganised the objectives and made minor edits.
	61	+- Wrote a first version of the Music Management page.
	62	+- Provided some feedback about the evaluation and gave some input about the evaluation process.
64	64
	64	+**Presentation**
	65	+This week as Pietro was contact case one day before the presentation, I had to replace him for the presentation.
	66	+- Make every slides that I presented (as nothing was ready before).
	67	+- Write the text of my presentation (as nothing was ready before).
	68	+- Give feedback about slides of other speakers
	69	+-
	70	+I had to write every slides that I would present as well as the text as nothing was prepared in advance.
	71	+We rehearsed with Mathieu and Manolo before the presentation.
	72	+We presented in front of the class.
65	65
	74	+
66	66	==== Week 6====
67		-As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this projects needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
	76	+As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this project needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
	77	+**Managing**
	78	+- Made a list of tasks accessible and editable online that with level of emergency to complete t
	79	+- Asked preferences of each team members to complete the task
	80	+- Provided description to each task
	81	+- Helped individually person to get on track with the project
	82	+- Reminded people to complete their part. Otherwise, we would not meet the deliverable deadline.
	83	+As some people didn't participate much in
	84	+- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki.
68	68
69		-
	86	+**Report**
	87	+- Implemented the feedback from the presentation:
	88	+ - Reworked on the Team Design Patterns
	89	+ -
70	70	==== Week 7====
	91	+**Managing**
71	71	- Ontology
72	72	- Design pattern
73	73
	95	+**With SNEHA**
	96	+-
	97	+Use cases:
	98	+- We corrected some mapping error between UC step, Requirement and
	99	+- We updated the claims according to the feedback and made the appropriate changes to the use cases, so that it matches well
74	74
	101	+- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki.
75	75
76	76	==== Week 8====
	104	+**Managing**
77	77
78	78
79	79
80	80
	109	+- Contacted Bart to add some new pages and feature to the Xwiki.
81	81
82	82	== Personal Reflections==
83	83