Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -17,30 +17,15 @@
17	17
18	18	Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose.
19	19
20		-Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
21		-
22		-
23	23	==== Week 2====
24		-We splitted the team in two subteams. Sneha and I would work on the report while the rest of the group would work on the code.
25		-The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas.
26		-Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia.
	21	+We splitted the tea
	22	+- Personas
27	27
28		-Sneha and I defined based on this decision three personas:
29		-- Annabelle a 36 years old women with early stage of vascular dementia.
30		-- Charles a 80 years old man with mild dementia.
31		-- Lucy a healthcare person.
32	32
33		-We made some notes about it and only wrote it in the xWiki the beginning of the following week.
34	34
35		-We improved the report by editing the following sections:
36		-- Objectives. We modified our objectives and categorised them in two categories: Increase the life span and Improve quality of life.
37		--
38	38	==== Week 3====
39		-Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and the general goals of the robot.
	27	+- Use cases
40	40
41		-We mainly worked on the use cases which was a considerable load of work.
42		-As the "technical" subteam gave us some feedback on what was feasible, Sneha and I precised the feasible objectives and came up with 4 different use cases.
43		-We defined these use cases,
44	44
45	45
46	46	==== Week 4====
...	...	@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
48	48	- Ontology
49	49
50	50
	36	+
51	51	==== Week 5====
52	52	PRESENTATION:
53	53	-
...	...	@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@
61	61
62	62
63	63	==== Week 6====
64		-As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this projects needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
65	65
66	66
	52	+
67	67	==== Week 7====
68	68	- Ontology
69	69	- Design pattern