Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -9,48 +9,34 @@
9	9
10	10	I chose to work on two aspects:
11	11	**Location of PwD:**
12		-I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificities of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
	12	+I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificity of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
13	13
14	14	**Interaction Goals:**
15	15	I researched the needs of people with dementia. I identified three types of goals the chosen robot could fulfil: functional, emotional, and safety.
16	16	I listed 5 to 10 potential use cases per goal that I found to be either the most important or very original and not already fulfil.
17	17
18		-Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose.
	18	+==== Week 2====
19	19
20		-Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
21	21
22	22
23		-==== Week 2====
24		-We splitted the team in two subteams. Sneha and I would work on the report while the rest of the group would work on the code.
25		-The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas.
26		-Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia.
	22	+- Personas
27	27
28		-Sneha and I defined based on this decision three personas:
29		-- Annabelle a 36 years old women with early stage of vascular dementia.
30		-- Charles a 80 years old man with mild dementia.
31		-- Lucy a healthcare person.
32	32
33		-We made some notes about it and only wrote it in the xWiki the beginning of the following week.
	25	+== Week 3==
34	34
35		-We improved the report by editing the following sections:
36		-- Objectives. We modified our objectives and categorised them in two categories: Increase the life span and Improve quality of life.
37		--
38		-==== Week 3====
39		-Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and the general goals of the robot.
	27	+- Use cases
40	40
41		-We mainly worked on the use cases which was a considerable load of work.
42		-As the "technical" subteam gave us some feedback on what was feasible, Sneha and I precised the feasible objectives and came up with 4 different use cases.
43		-We defined these use cases,
44	44
	30	+== Week 4==
45	45
46		-==== Week 4====
47	47	- Design Patterns
48	48	- Ontology
49	49
50	50
51		-==== Week 5====
52		-PRESENTATION:
53		--
	36	+== Week 5==
	37	+
	38	+- Presenting
	39	+
54	54	REPORT:
55	55	- Claims
56	56	- Requirements
...	...	@@ -59,23 +59,22 @@
59	59	I also provided some feedback about
60	60
61	61
	48	+== Week 6==
62	62
63		-==== Week 6====
64		-As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this projects needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
65	65
66	66
67		-==== Week 7====
68		-- Ontology
69		-- Design pattern
70	70
	53	+== Week 7==
71	71
	55	+-Ontology
	56	+-Design pattern
72	72
73		-==== Week 8====
74	74
	59	+== Week 8==
75	75
76	76
77	77
78	78
79		-== Personal Reflections==
	64	+= Personal Reflections=
80	80
81	81