Skip to Content

Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37
From version Icon 17.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/21 22:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 22.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/21 23:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -9,20 +9,38 @@
9 9  
10 10  I chose to work on two aspects:
11 11  **Location of PwD:**
12 -I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificity of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
12 +I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificities of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
13 13  
14 14  **Interaction Goals:**
15 15  I researched the needs of people with dementia. I identified three types of goals the chosen robot could fulfil: functional, emotional, and safety.
16 16  I listed 5 to 10 potential use cases per goal that I found to be either the most important or very original and not already fulfil.
17 17  
18 +Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose.
19 +
20 +Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
21 +
22 +
18 18  ==== Week 2====
19 -- Personas
24 +We splitted the team in two subteams. Sneha and I would work on the report while the rest of the group would work on the code.
25 +The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas.
26 +Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia.
20 20  
28 +Sneha and I defined based on this decision three personas:
29 +- Annabelle a 36 years old women with early stage of vascular dementia.
30 +- Charles a 80 years old man with mild dementia.
31 +- Lucy a healthcare person.
21 21  
33 +We made some notes about it and only wrote it in the xWiki the beginning of the following week.
22 22  
35 +We improved the report by editing the following sections:
36 +- Objectives. We modified our objectives and categorised them in two categories: Increase the life span and Improve quality of life.
37 +-
23 23  ==== Week 3====
24 -- Use cases
39 +Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and the general goals of the robot.
25 25  
41 +We mainly worked on the use cases which was a considerable load of work.
42 +As the "technical" subteam gave us some feedback on what was feasible, Sneha and I precised the feasible objectives and came up with 4 different use cases.
43 +We defined these use cases,
26 26  
27 27  
28 28  ==== Week 4====
... ... @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
30 30  - Ontology
31 31  
32 32  
33 -
34 34  ==== Week 5====
35 35  PRESENTATION:
36 36  -
... ... @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@
44 44  
45 45  
46 46  ==== Week 6====
64 +As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this projects needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
47 47  
48 48  
49 -
50 50  ==== Week 7====
51 51  - Ontology
52 52  - Design pattern