Changes for page Pierre Bongrand

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 19:37

From version Icon 16.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/21 22:28
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 22.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/21 23:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -9,34 +9,48 @@
9 9  
10 10  I chose to work on two aspects:
11 11  **Location of PwD:**
12 -I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificity of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
12 +I have listed the advantages, disadvantages and specificities of two settings: health care center, and the patient's home.
13 13  
14 14  **Interaction Goals:**
15 15  I researched the needs of people with dementia. I identified three types of goals the chosen robot could fulfil: functional, emotional, and safety.
16 16  I listed 5 to 10 potential use cases per goal that I found to be either the most important or very original and not already fulfil.
17 17  
18 -==== Week 2====
18 +Finally, I presented this work to the team and we all made choices about: the type of dementia the patient would have, the potential goals and use cases we will focus on, the type of robot to chose.
19 19  
20 +Based on my work, we wrote with Sneha and Haoran a first version of: the environment, the stakeholders, the problem scenario, the objectives. We also defined a first use case.
20 20  
21 21  
22 -- Personas
23 +==== Week 2====
24 +We splitted the team in two subteams. Sneha and I would work on the report while the rest of the group would work on the code.
25 +The point of this was that we could both get an idea on how to code our technical solution and define our problem scenario and personas.
26 +Sneha and I decided based on a series of argument and by the willingness of the group to implement a solution based on communication that the project will be oriented for patient with early stage and mild dementia.
23 23  
28 +Sneha and I defined based on this decision three personas:
29 +- Annabelle a 36 years old women with early stage of vascular dementia.
30 +- Charles a 80 years old man with mild dementia.
31 +- Lucy a healthcare person.
24 24  
25 -== Week 3==
33 +We made some notes about it and only wrote it in the xWiki the beginning of the following week.
26 26  
27 -- Use cases
35 +We improved the report by editing the following sections:
36 +- Objectives. We modified our objectives and categorised them in two categories: Increase the life span and Improve quality of life.
37 +-
38 +==== Week 3====
39 +Even though we wanted to switch roles week by week so that everyone would be proficient both with the code and the report we didn't as we accumulated a bit of work from the previous week in both subteams. As a result, I worked with Sneha this week on the report and the general goals of the robot.
28 28  
41 +We mainly worked on the use cases which was a considerable load of work.
42 +As the "technical" subteam gave us some feedback on what was feasible, Sneha and I precised the feasible objectives and came up with 4 different use cases.
43 +We defined these use cases,
29 29  
30 -== Week 4==
31 31  
46 +==== Week 4====
32 32  - Design Patterns
33 33  - Ontology
34 34  
35 35  
36 -== Week 5==
37 -
38 -- Presenting
39 -
51 +==== Week 5====
52 +PRESENTATION:
53 +-
40 40  REPORT:
41 41  - Claims
42 42  - Requirements
... ... @@ -45,22 +45,23 @@
45 45  I also provided some feedback about
46 46  
47 47  
48 -== Week 6==
49 49  
63 +==== Week 6====
64 +As many deadlines are approaching at the end of the block and the deliverables for this projects needs to be finished soon, I took a bit of managerial position.
50 50  
51 51  
67 +==== Week 7====
68 +- Ontology
69 +- Design pattern
52 52  
53 -== Week 7==
54 54  
55 --Ontology
56 --Design pattern
57 57  
73 +==== Week 8====
58 58  
59 -== Week 8==
60 60  
61 61  
62 62  
63 63  
64 -= Personal Reflections=
79 +== Personal Reflections==
65 65  
66 66