Changes for page Mathieu Jung-Muller
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/05 10:21
From version
24.1


edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/03/27 23:37
on 2022/03/27 23:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
27.1

edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/04/05 10:21
on 2022/04/05 10:21
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 1 1 French engineering student doing the CS Masters in TUD for a double degree. 2 2 //I enjoy writing code and programming for something else than computer science itself (biology, social sciences, teaching, etc). For this reason, I am really motivated by this course as it provides the opportunity to create a prototype of a robot agent that would have a real positive impact on people and society.// 3 3 4 + 4 4 **Week 1:** 5 5 For this week, we had to decide in which direction we wanted to go. For this reason, we split research to do among the six of us. 6 6 My part was focused on how old people interact with technology, and how to make it the most adapted for the elderly. ... ... @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ 29 29 I implemented the activity that we would use for the evaluation. I also prepared what the participants would do and planned the evaluation in a more general way (make form with availabilities, send messages, etc). 30 30 31 31 **Week 7:** 32 -I had to correct the forms that were not done properly. I improved the Pepper behaviour for the evaluation. I showed to the other team members how to use Choregraphe and how to run the behaviour for the evaluation, as well as telling them what they should say to the participants and how the experiment should be conducted. 33 +I had to correct the evaluation forms that were not done properly. 34 +I improved the Pepper behaviour for the evaluation. I showed to the other team members how to use Choregraphe and how to run the behaviour for the evaluation, as well as telling them what they should say to the participants and how the experiment should be conducted. 33 33 I organized the sessions (which participants and team members should come when). I also did 8 evaluation sessions on Monday and 3 on Thursday. (I took part in two evaluations of other groups as well. I wanted to do the four of them, but was not available.) 34 34 On top of that, I also went through many of our wiki pages to update them based on the comments the professors gave us. 35 35 I prepared my part of the presentation as well. ... ... @@ -36,3 +36,17 @@ 36 36 37 37 **Week 8:** 38 38 I finished the preparation of the presentation, then presented. 41 +I verified that all our behaviours of the prototype worked properly, before marking the code as final and ready for submission. 42 +I also contributed a lot to the wiki, in order to finish the parts that still needed to be done or improved. 43 +Finally, I exported the wiki and made the final PDF. I also handed in the source code on the GitLab project I had been added to. 44 + 45 + 46 + 47 +In my team, I had the role of key member. I got involved in every aspect of the project and always had a global overview of what was happening every week. 48 +For this reason, my teammates often referred to me when they had questions about some parts of the project. 49 +I also made the link between the specifications in the wiki and the implementation, making sure that both parts were always in line as much as possible, and informing my teammates when there was a conflict to solve (either change the implementation or modify the documentation in the wiki). 50 + 51 + 52 + 53 +This project was my first time building a robot agent for human-robot interactions. I found it very interesting and enjoyed it a lot. 54 +It gave me insights on the important factors to take into account when designing an interactive and autonomous prototype. I particularly appreciated the fact that the project underlined an actual problem for society, i.e., how to cope with dementia and how to improve the lives of the patients and their relatives.