Skip to Content
Last modified by Mathieu Jung-Muller on 2022/04/04 13:55
From version Icon 13.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/03/30 00:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 12.1 Icon
edited by Mathieu Jung-Muller
on 2022/03/30 00:36
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@
332 332  
333 333  )))|(((
334 334  //Notion of the validity (e.g., empirically tested)//
335 -This can be tested by performing some other IDPs, which refer to utilizing the breakdown of a particular activity. Since this is for now hard-coded into Pepper, it is not empirically testable.
335 +This can be tested by performing some other IDPs, which refer to utilizing the breakdown of a particular activity. Since this some programmed into Pepper, it is not empirically testable.
336 336  )))
337 337  |(((
338 338  **DESIGN PROBLEM (what)**
... ... @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
341 341  )))|(((
342 342  //Concise description of the intended interaction (effect on the user and/or user interaction with the system and/or other parties).//
343 343  
344 -This design pattern is used by the HCP (or a relative) to enter some activities into Pepper, that the PwD might personally enjoy. This is so that Pepper's system contains the breakdown to certain desired activities.
344 +This design pattern is used by the HCP in order to enter some activities into Pepper, that that the PwD might personally enjoy. This is so that Pepper's system contains the breakdown to certain desired activities.
345 345  )))
346 346  |(((
347 347  
... ... @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
361 361  )))|(((
362 362  //Essential characteristics of the design solution that express the interaction intention.//
363 363  
364 -The interface has not been implemented. Ideally, the interface designed is easy to use, HCP and relatives are not required to have very high technical knowledge.
364 +Here in order to easy configuration of Pepper, we will utilize the tablet feature where the HPC can enter activity steps. This is so that the caregiver also has some autonomy over Pepper rather than just the developers. The interface designed is easy to use as, HCPs are not required to have very high technical knowledge.
365 365  )))
366 366  |(((
367 367  **DESIGN RATIONALE (why)**
... ... @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
369 369  
370 370  )))|(((
371 371  //Argumentation that resulted in the chosen design solution.//
372 -We allow the HCP to provide steps as they are the ones that have spent a significant amount of time with the PwD and know about their likes and dislikes. In this case, they can also provide the steps in the complexity they think the PwD will understand, rather than simply having some arbitrary steps from the internet.
372 +We allow the HPC to provide steps has they are they ones that have spent a significant amount of time with the PwD and know about their likes and dislikes. In this case they can also provide the steps in the complexity they think the PwD will understand, rather than having some arbitrary step up of steps from the internet.
373 373  
374 374  )))
375 375  |(((
... ... @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
393 393  
394 394  )))|(((
395 395  //Notion of the validity (e.g., empirically tested)//
396 -This can be empirically tested as the PwD, and other evaluators around, can hear Pepper saying a step to the PwD.
396 +This can be empirically tested as the PwD, and other evaluators around can hear Pepper saying a step to the PwD.
397 397  
398 398  )))
399 399  |(((
... ... @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
422 422  
423 423  )))|(((
424 424  //Essential characteristics of the design solution that express the interaction intention.//
425 -Here, already having the activity broken down into certain steps is very crucial. Also Pepper needs to say these steps verbally so the user can hear and act appropriately.
425 +Here already having the activity broken down into certain steps is very crucial. Also Pepper needs to stay these steps verbally so the user can hear and act appropriately.
426 426  )))
427 427  |(((
428 428  **DESIGN RATIONALE (why)**
... ... @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@
430 430  
431 431  )))|(((
432 432  //Argumentation that resulted in the chosen design solution.//
433 -A verbal step here works better than merely following steps from a website, as would happen commonly these days. Also we believe that having Pepper as a physical being there might encourage the PwD to perform activities they used to enjoy, with higher frequency as Pepper would come up to them and ask them if they want to take part in an activity they enjoy.
433 +A verbal step here works better than a simply following steps from a website, as would happen commonly these days. Also we believe that having Pepper's as a physical being there might encourage the PwD to perform activities they used to enjoy with higher frequency as Pepper would come up to them and ask them in they want to take part in an activity they enjoy.
434 434  )))
435 435  |(((
436 436  **EXAMPLES (as seen on…)**