Wiki source code of Inclusive Design
Version 19.1 by Haoran Wang on 2022/03/15 11:35
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
6.1 | 1 | Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]] |
| |
7.1 | 2 | |
| |
17.1 | 3 | The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations. |
| |
11.1 | 4 | |
| |
7.1 | 5 | For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps: |
| |
15.1 | 6 | |
| |
8.1 | 7 | 1. Perceptual |
| |
9.1 | 8 | * Blind |
| |
11.1 | 9 | * Partially sighted |
| |
9.1 | 10 | * Deaf |
| 11 | |||
| 12 | 2. Motor | ||
| 13 | |||
| |
11.1 | 14 | * Limited motion |
| 15 | * No use of limbs | ||
| 16 | * Use of mobility assistance | ||
| |
8.1 | 17 | |
| |
9.1 | 18 | 3. Cognitive |
| |
8.1 | 19 | |
| |
9.1 | 20 | * Dementia |
| 21 | * Down's Syndrome | ||
| 22 | * Autism | ||
| |
2.1 | 23 | |
| |
17.1 | 24 | == Participatory Design == |
| |
16.1 | 25 | Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages. |
| 26 | Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users. | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | |||
| |
17.1 | 29 | == SCE and Inclusive Design == |
| 30 | In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part. There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user. | ||
| |
16.1 | 31 | |
| 32 | 1. Personas and scenarios | ||
| 33 | Envision diverse users | ||
| 34 | 2. Design patterns | ||
| 35 | Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences | ||
| 36 | 3. Evaluation | ||
| 37 | Involve diverse users | ||
| 38 | |||
| |
18.1 | 39 | == Our Design == |
| |
3.1 | 40 | Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases: |
| |
2.1 | 41 | |
| |
3.1 | 42 | === Deaf patient === |
| |
2.1 | 43 | |
| 44 | Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD | ||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | |||
| |
3.1 | 47 | === Price === |
| |
2.1 | 48 | |
| |
11.1 | 49 | Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out. |
| |
2.1 | 50 | |
| 51 | |||
| |
12.1 | 52 | === Different needs === |
| |
2.1 | 53 | |
| 54 | |||
| |
12.1 | 55 | We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients. |
| 56 | |||
| |
4.1 | 57 | -> Examples? |
| |
2.1 | 58 | |
| |
4.1 | 59 | |
| 60 | |||
| 61 |