Changes for page Inclusive Design

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56

From version Icon 8.1 Icon
edited by Haoran Wang
on 2022/03/14 21:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 2.1 Icon
edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.haoranwang
1 +XWiki.PierreBongrand
Content
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,5 @@
1 -Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2 -
3 -For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
4 -
5 -1. Perceptual
6 -
7 -* List item
8 -* List item
9 -* List item
10 -
11 -1. Motor
12 -1. Cognitive
13 -
14 -- Perceptual
1 +We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
2 +- Perceptual:
15 15  * Blind
16 16  * Deaf
17 17  - Motor
... ... @@ -23,27 +23,23 @@
23 23  *Autism
24 24  
25 25  
26 -There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
14 +There is no Generic "disabled user".
27 27  
28 -Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
16 +Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
29 29  
18 +In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
30 30  
31 -=== Deaf patient ===
32 32  
21 +== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
22 +
33 33  Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
34 34  
35 35  
36 -=== Price ===
26 +== Improvements of our design: Price ==
37 37  
38 38  Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
39 39  
40 40  
41 41  
42 -We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients.
43 43  
44 --> Examples?
45 45  
46 -
47 -
48 -
49 -