Changes for page Inclusive Design
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56
From version
8.1


edited by Haoran Wang
on 2022/03/14 21:32
on 2022/03/14 21:32
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
2.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:06
on 2022/03/14 16:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. haoranwang1 +XWiki.PierreBongrand - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,5 @@ 1 -Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]] 2 - 3 -For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps: 4 - 5 -1. Perceptual 6 - 7 -* List item 8 -* List item 9 -* List item 10 - 11 -1. Motor 12 -1. Cognitive 13 - 14 -- Perceptual 1 +We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap: 2 +- Perceptual: 15 15 * Blind 16 16 * Deaf 17 17 - Motor ... ... @@ -23,27 +23,23 @@ 23 23 *Autism 24 24 25 25 26 -There is no generic "disabled user".Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.14 +There is no Generic "disabled user". 27 27 28 - Our designwas already made forpeople withdementia.However, thisctureandthefeedbackfromthepresentationofthepreviousweekhelped us toconsider twomore general cases:16 +Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so? 29 29 18 +In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient. 30 30 31 -=== Deaf patient === 32 32 21 +== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient == 22 + 33 33 Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD 34 34 35 35 36 -== =Price ===26 +== Improvements of our design: Price == 37 37 38 38 Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out. 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 -We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients. 43 43 44 --> Examples? 45 45 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 -