Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,24 +1,44 @@
1	1	Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2	2
	3	+The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
	4	+
3	3	For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
4	4
5		-- Perceptual
	7	+1. Perceptual
6	6	* Blind
	9	+* Partially sighted
7	7	* Deaf
8		-- Motor
9		-*
10	10
11		-- Cognitive
12		-*Dementia
13		-*Down's syndrome
14		-*Autism
	12	+2. Motor
15	15
	14	+* Limited motion
	15	+* No use of limbs
	16	+* Use of mobility assistance
16	16
17		-There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
	18	+3. Cognitive
18	18
19		-Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
	20	+* Dementia
	21	+* Down's Syndrome
	22	+* Autism
20	20
	24	+== Participatory Design ==
	25	+Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages.
	26	+Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users.
21	21
	28	+
	29	+== SCE and Inclusive Design ==
	30	+In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part. There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
	31	+
	32	+1. Personas and scenarios
	33	+Envision diverse users
	34	+2. Design patterns
	35	+Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences
	36	+3. Evaluation
	37	+Involve diverse users
	38	+
	39	+== Our Design ==
	40	+Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
	41	+
22	22	=== Deaf patient ===
23	23
24	24	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
...	...	@@ -26,15 +26,16 @@
26	26
27	27	=== Price ===
28	28
29		-Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
	49	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
30	30
31	31
	52	+=== Different needs ===
32	32
33		-We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients.
34	34
	55	+We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
	56	+
35	35	-> Examples?
36	36
37	37
38	38
39	39
40		-