Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,19 +1,25 @@
1	1	Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2	2
3		-For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
	3	+The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
4	4
5		-- Perceptual
	5	+For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
	6	+1. Perceptual
6	6	* Blind
	8	+* Partially sighted
7	7	* Deaf
8		-- Motor
9		-*
10	10
11		-- Cognitive
12		-*Dementia
13		-*Down's syndrome
14		-*Autism
	11	+2. Motor
15	15
	13	+* Limited motion
	14	+* No use of limbs
	15	+* Use of mobility assistance
16	16
	17	+3. Cognitive
	18	+
	19	+* Dementia
	20	+* Down's Syndrome
	21	+* Autism
	22	+
17	17	There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
18	18
19	19	Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
...	...	@@ -26,15 +26,19 @@
26	26
27	27	=== Price ===
28	28
29		-Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
	35	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
30	30
31	31
	38	+=== Different needs ===
32	32
33		-We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients.
34	34
	41	+We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
	42	+
35	35	-> Examples?
36	36
37	37
38	38
	47	+= Participatory Design =
39	39
40	40
	50	+