Changes for page Inclusive Design
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56
From version
6.1


edited by Haoran Wang
on 2022/03/14 21:31
on 2022/03/14 21:31
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
2.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:06
on 2022/03/14 16:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. haoranwang1 +XWiki.PierreBongrand - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ 1 -Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]] 2 -For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps. 3 -- Perceptual 1 +We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap: 2 +- Perceptual: 4 4 * Blind 5 5 * Deaf 6 6 - Motor ... ... @@ -12,27 +12,23 @@ 12 12 *Autism 13 13 14 14 15 -There is no generic "disabled user".Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.14 +There is no Generic "disabled user". 16 16 17 - Our designwas already made forpeople withdementia.However, thisctureandthefeedbackfromthepresentationofthepreviousweekhelped us toconsider twomore general cases:16 +Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so? 18 18 18 +In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient. 19 19 20 -=== Deaf patient === 21 21 21 +== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient == 22 + 22 22 Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD 23 23 24 24 25 -== =Price ===26 +== Improvements of our design: Price == 26 26 27 27 Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out. 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 -We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients. 32 32 33 --> Examples? 34 34 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 -