Changes for page Inclusive Design

Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56

From version Icon 30.1 Icon
edited by Bart Vastenhouw
on 2022/03/31 10:45
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 20.1 Icon
edited by Haoran Wang
on 2022/03/15 11:40
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.BartVastenhouw
1 +XWiki.haoranwang
Content
... ... @@ -4,25 +4,17 @@
4 4  
5 5  For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
6 6  
7 -{{html}}
8 -<ul><li>
9 9  1. Perceptual
8 +* Blind
9 +* Partially sighted
10 +* Deaf
10 10  
11 -<ul><li>
12 -Blind </li><li>
13 -Partially sighted</li><li>
14 -Deaf
15 -</li></ul>
16 -
17 17  2. Motor
18 18  
19 -<ul><li>
20 -Limited motion</li><li>
21 -No use of limbs</li><li>
22 -Use of mobility assistance
23 -</li></ul>
14 +* Limited motion
15 +* No use of limbs
16 +* Use of mobility assistance
24 24  
25 -
26 26  3. Cognitive
27 27  
28 28  * Dementia
... ... @@ -29,13 +29,6 @@
29 29  * Down's Syndrome
30 30  * Autism
31 31  
32 -
33 -
34 -
35 -{{/html}}
36 -
37 -
38 -
39 39  == Participatory Design ==
40 40  Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages.
41 41  Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users.
... ... @@ -47,31 +47,30 @@
47 47  1. Personas and scenarios
48 48  Envision diverse users: We should envision as many as possible personas and scenarios to include as many different situations as possible. However, it is impossible to include all kinds of situations in the prototype as the inclusive design is a dynamic process. It should be used and evaluated throughout the whole development process.
49 49  2. Design patterns
50 -Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences: All people have differences, which makes design patterns extremely hard. We need to consider and address the potential differences between people.
35 +Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences
51 51  3. Evaluation
52 -Involve diverse users: Evaluation would have more powerful insights if it involves more people. Unexpected situations may be presented during the evaluation process, thus we can fix the problem and make it more suitable for different people.
37 +Involve diverse users
53 53  
54 54  == Our Design ==
55 55  Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
56 56  
57 57  === Deaf patient ===
58 -Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD. We can also adjust the volume of Pepper to the PwD's need.
59 59  
44 +Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
45 +
46 +
60 60  === Price ===
61 -Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out. However, technically speaking, there may be a small portion of people who can afford the Pepper robot, since the cost of research, development, and material of Pepper are expensive. But Pepper could be used for a long time. Therefore, the cost can be averaged out in the long run.
62 62  
63 -=== Different needs ===
64 -In our prototype, we have not considered too much about the different needs of PwDs. It is impossible to involve all needs since we only have three personas. We can only envision limited needs because of restricted resources and situations.
49 +Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
65 65  
66 -We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
67 67  
68 -=== Examples ===
52 +=== Different needs ===
69 69  
70 -1. Not all PwDs have the same routine. We designed the medication/activity reminder to customize to different users. HPCs and relatives can set reminders for the PwD.
71 -2. Not all PwDs have the same activities.
72 -3. PwDs have different degrees of dementia. In our case, we are focusing on people who are in the earlier stage of dementia.
73 73  
55 +We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
74 74  
57 +-> Examples?
75 75  
76 76  
77 77  
61 +