Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.PierreBongrand
	1	+XWiki.haoranwang

Content

...	...	@@ -1,33 +1,45 @@
1		-We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
2		-- Perceptual:
	1	+Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
	2	+
	3	+For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
	4	+
	5	+1. Perceptual
	6	+
3	3	* Blind
4	4	* Deaf
5		-- Motor
6		-*
7	7
8		-- Cognitive
9		-*Dementia
10		-*Down's syndrome
11		-*Autism
	10	+2. Motor
12	12
	12	+* List item
	13	+* List item
13	13
14		-There is no Generic "disabled user".
	15	+3. Cognitive
15	15
16		-Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
	17	+* Dementia
	18	+* Down's Syndrome
	19	+* Autism
17	17
18		-In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
19	19
	22	+There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
20	20
21		-== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
	24	+Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
22	22
	26	+
	27	+=== Deaf patient ===
	28	+
23	23	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
24	24
25	25
26		-== Improvements of our design: Price ==
	32	+=== Price ===
27	27
28	28	Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
29	29
30	30
31	31
	38	+We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients.
32	32
	40	+-> Examples?
33	33
	42	+
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+