Changes for page Inclusive Design
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56
From version
2.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:06
on 2022/03/14 16:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
4.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:25
on 2022/03/14 16:25
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ 1 - Weneedtocomeup witha universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:2 -- Perceptual :1 +It is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap: 2 +- Perceptual 3 3 * Blind 4 4 * Deaf 5 5 - Motor ... ... @@ -11,23 +11,27 @@ 11 11 *Autism 12 12 13 13 14 -There is no Generic "disabled user".14 +There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas helped us to consider a more robust user. 15 15 16 - Is our solution economicallyaccessible(Canusersaffordourdesign?)?Ifyes,howso?16 +Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases: 17 17 18 -In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient. 19 19 19 +=== Deaf patient === 20 20 21 -== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient == 22 - 23 23 Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD 24 24 25 25 26 -== Improvements of our design:Price ==24 +=== Price === 27 27 28 28 Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out. 29 29 30 30 31 31 30 +We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients. 32 32 32 +-> Examples? 33 33 34 + 35 + 36 + 37 +