Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.PierreBongrand
	1	+XWiki.haoranwang

Content

...	...	@@ -1,33 +1,63 @@
1		-We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
2		-- Perceptual:
	1	+Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
	2	+
	3	+The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
	4	+
	5	+For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
	6	+1. Perceptual
3	3	* Blind
	8	+* Partially sighted
4	4	* Deaf
5		-- Motor
6		-*
7	7
8		-- Cognitive
9		-*Dementia
10		-*Down's syndrome
11		-*Autism
	11	+2. Motor
12	12
	13	+* Limited motion
	14	+* No use of limbs
	15	+* Use of mobility assistance
13	13
14		-There is no Generic "disabled user".
	17	+3. Cognitive
15	15
16		-Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
	19	+* Dementia
	20	+* Down's Syndrome
	21	+* Autism
17	17
18		-In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
	23	+There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
19	19
	25	+Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
20	20
21		-== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
22	22
	28	+=== Deaf patient ===
	29	+
23	23	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
24	24
25	25
26		-== Improvements of our design: Price ==
	33	+=== Price ===
27	27
28		-Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
	35	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
29	29
30	30
	38	+=== Different needs ===
31	31
32	32
	41	+We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
33	33
	43	+-> Examples?
	44	+
	45	+
	46	+
	47	+= Participatory Design =
	48	+Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages.
	49	+Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users.
	50	+
	51	+
	52	+= SCE and Inclusive Design =
	53	+In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part.
	54	+
	55	+1. Personas and scenarios
	56	+Envision diverse users
	57	+2. Design patterns
	58	+Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences
	59	+3. Evaluation
	60	+Involve diverse users
	61	+
	62	+
	63	+