Changes for page Inclusive Design
Last modified by Pierre Bongrand on 2022/04/05 20:56
From version
18.1


edited by Haoran Wang
on 2022/03/15 11:35
on 2022/03/15 11:35
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version
2.1


edited by Pierre Bongrand
on 2022/03/14 16:06
on 2022/03/14 16:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. haoranwang1 +XWiki.PierreBongrand - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,63 +1,33 @@ 1 -Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]] 2 - 3 -The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations. 4 - 5 -For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps: 6 - 7 -1. Perceptual 1 +We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap: 2 +- Perceptual: 8 8 * Blind 9 -* Partially sighted 10 10 * Deaf 5 +- Motor 6 +* 11 11 12 -2. Motor 8 +- Cognitive 9 +*Dementia 10 +*Down's syndrome 11 +*Autism 13 13 14 -* Limited motion 15 -* No use of limbs 16 -* Use of mobility assistance 17 17 18 - 3.Cognitive14 +There is no Generic "disabled user". 19 19 20 -* Dementia 21 -* Down's Syndrome 22 -* Autism 16 +Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so? 23 23 24 -== Participatory Design == 25 -Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages. 26 -Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users. 18 +In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient. 27 27 28 28 29 -== SCE and Inclusive Design == 30 -In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part. There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user. 21 +== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient == 31 31 32 -1. Personas and scenarios 33 -Envision diverse users 34 -2. Design patterns 35 -Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences 36 -3. Evaluation 37 -Involve diverse users 38 - 39 -== Our Design == 40 - 41 -Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases: 42 - 43 - 44 -=== Deaf patient === 45 - 46 46 Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD 47 47 48 48 49 -== =Price ===26 +== Improvements of our design: Price == 50 50 51 -Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper 'scost averages out.28 +Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out. 52 52 53 53 54 -=== Different needs === 55 55 56 56 57 -We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients. 58 58 59 --> Examples? 60 - 61 - 62 - 63 -