Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.haoranwang
	1	+XWiki.PierreBongrand

Content

...	...	@@ -1,64 +1,33 @@
1		-Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2		-
3		-The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
4		-
5		-For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
6		-
7		-1. Perceptual
	1	+We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
	2	+- Perceptual:
8	8	* Blind
9		-* Partially sighted
10	10	* Deaf
	5	+- Motor
	6	+*
11	11
12		-2. Motor
	8	+- Cognitive
	9	+*Dementia
	10	+*Down's syndrome
	11	+*Autism
13	13
14		-* Limited motion
15		-* No use of limbs
16		-* Use of mobility assistance
17	17
18		-3. Cognitive
	14	+There is no Generic "disabled user".
19	19
20		-* Dementia
21		-* Down's Syndrome
22		-* Autism
	16	+Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
23	23
24		-There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
	18	+In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
25	25
26		-Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
27	27
	21	+== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
28	28
29		-=== Deaf patient ===
30		-
31	31	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
32	32
33	33
34		-=== Price ===
	26	+== Improvements of our design: Price ==
35	35
36		-Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
	28	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
37	37
38	38
39		-=== Different needs ===
40	40
41	41
42		-We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
43	43
44		--> Examples?
45		-
46		-
47		-
48		-= Participatory Design =
49		-Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages.
50		-Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users.
51		-
52		-
53		-= SCE and Inclusive Design =
54		-In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part.
55		-
56		-1. Personas and scenarios
57		-Envision diverse users
58		-2. Design patterns
59		-Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences
60		-3. Evaluation
61		-Involve diverse users
62		-
63		-
64		-