Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.haoranwang
	1	+XWiki.PierreBongrand

Content

...	...	@@ -1,50 +1,33 @@
1		-Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2		-
3		-The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
4		-
5		-For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
6		-1. Perceptual
	1	+We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
	2	+- Perceptual:
7	7	* Blind
8		-* Partially sighted
9	9	* Deaf
	5	+- Motor
	6	+*
10	10
11		-2. Motor
	8	+- Cognitive
	9	+*Dementia
	10	+*Down's syndrome
	11	+*Autism
12	12
13		-* Limited motion
14		-* No use of limbs
15		-* Use of mobility assistance
16	16
17		-3. Cognitive
	14	+There is no Generic "disabled user".
18	18
19		-* Dementia
20		-* Down's Syndrome
21		-* Autism
	16	+Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
22	22
23		-There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
	18	+In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
24	24
25		-Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
26	26
	21	+== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
27	27
28		-=== Deaf patient ===
29		-
30	30	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
31	31
32	32
33		-=== Price ===
	26	+== Improvements of our design: Price ==
34	34
35		-Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
	28	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
36	36
37	37
38		-=== Different needs ===
39	39
40	40
41		-We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
42	42
43		--> Examples?
44		-
45		-
46		-
47		-= Participatory Design =
48		-
49		-
50		-