Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.haoranwang
	1	+XWiki.PierreBongrand

Content

...	...	@@ -1,43 +1,33 @@
1		-Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
2		-
3		-For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
4		-1. Perceptual
	1	+We need to come up with a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicap:
	2	+- Perceptual:
5	5	* Blind
6	6	* Deaf
	5	+- Motor
	6	+*
7	7
8		-2. Motor
	8	+- Cognitive
	9	+*Dementia
	10	+*Down's syndrome
	11	+*Autism
9	9
10		-* List item
11		-* List item
12	12
13		-3. Cognitive
	14	+There is no Generic "disabled user".
14	14
15		-* Dementia
16		-* Down's Syndrome
17		-* Autism
	16	+Is our solution economically accessible (Can users afford our design?)? If yes, how so?
18	18
	18	+In our case, this lecture and the feedback received during the presentation made us think about patients with hearing impairment/deaf. Secondly, we also measured wether or not this solution is affordable to patient.
19	19
20		-There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
21	21
22		-Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
	21	+== Improvements of our design: Deaf patient ==
23	23
24		-
25		-=== Deaf patient ===
26		-
27	27	Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
28	28
29	29
30		-=== Price ===
	26	+== Improvements of our design: Price ==
31	31
32	32	Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper cost averages out.
33	33
34	34
35	35
36		-We paid additional details to not making wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronising or stigmatising the patients.
37	37
38		--> Examples?
39	39
40		-
41		-
42		-
43		-