Changes for page Inclusive Design

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.BartVastenhouw
	1	+XWiki.haoranwang

Content

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,64 @@
	1	+Inclusive design is a design process in which a product, service, or environment is designed to be usable for as many people as possible, particularly groups who are traditionally excluded from being able to use an interface or navigate an environment. [[Wikipedia>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusive_design#:~:text=Inclusive%20design%20is%20a%20design,interface%20or%20navigate%20an%20environment.]]
	2	+
	3	+The objective of inclusive design is to make artifacts accessible to and used by as many people as possible in a wide variety of situations.
	4	+
	5	+For our case, it is necessary to have a universal design that is inclusive to a variety of people that may have different handicaps:
	6	+
	7	+1. Perceptual
	8	+* Blind
	9	+* Partially sighted
	10	+* Deaf
	11	+
	12	+2. Motor
	13	+
	14	+* Limited motion
	15	+* No use of limbs
	16	+* Use of mobility assistance
	17	+
	18	+3. Cognitive
	19	+
	20	+* Dementia
	21	+* Down's Syndrome
	22	+* Autism
	23	+
	24	+= Participatory Design =
	25	+Participatory design means involving users in design from the earliest stages. It can help researchers to interact with patients and develop functions that are neglected from the earlier stages.
	26	+Researchers would get a deep understanding of users and their needs so that they can empower users.
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+= SCE and Inclusive Design =
	30	+In the SCE process, inclusive design is also an important part.
	31	+
	32	+1. Personas and scenarios
	33	+Envision diverse users
	34	+2. Design patterns
	35	+Address possible social, cognitive, affective, and physical differences
	36	+3. Evaluation
	37	+Involve diverse users
	38	+
	39	+
	40	+There is no generic "disabled user". Creating different personas and scenarios helped us to consider a more robust user.
	41	+
	42	+Our design was already made for people with dementia. However, this lecture and the feedback from the presentation of the previous week helped us to consider two more general cases:
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+=== Deaf patient ===
	46	+
	47	+Use of redundant information leveraging both audio and visual channels of communications between Pepper and the PwD
	48	+
	49	+
	50	+=== Price ===
	51	+
	52	+Need to do the maths, because it might be that Pepper's cost averages out.
	53	+
	54	+
	55	+=== Different needs ===
	56	+
	57	+
	58	+We paid additional details to not make wrong assumptions about our users. By not stereotyping, not patronizing, or stigmatizing the patients.
	59	+
	60	+-> Examples?
	61	+
	62	+
	63	+
	64	+