Wiki source code of Test

Version 61.1 by Xinqi Li on 2022/04/01 22:21

Hide last authors
Xinqi Li 60.1 1 Our robot aims to help delay the stage of dementia or slow down the deterioration of memory. The best situation is that we can test the robot with real PwD and in a relatively long time period to see if this robot really works, which is impossible for our project. So our evaluation performs in a group control way. Participants are divided into two groups, group A with the intelligent one, and group B with the dumb one.
Xinqi Li 52.1 2
Andrei Stefan 30.1 3 = Problem statement and research questions =
Andrei Stefan 46.1 4
Andrei Stefan 34.1 5 The main use cases that the evaluation focuses on are UC001: Daily todo list and UC005: Quiz. Based on the claims corresponding to those use cases, we derive the following research questions:
Andrei Stefan 36.1 6
Xinqi Li 56.1 7 1. Are PwD willing to play the quiz?
8 1. Are PwD happy to listen to music?
9 1. Are PwD happy if they get the correct answer?
10 1. Does PwD enhance their memory of the association between music and activities?
Andrei Stefan 34.1 11
Andrei Stefan 1.2 12 = Method =
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 13
Xinqi Li 60.1 14 The control group evaluation is used. One group of participants interacts with a dumb robot and another group interacts with the intelligent robot. The only difference between these two groups is the independent variable - dumb or intelligent robot, which makes our result more reasonable.
Xinqi Li 54.1 15
16 Besides, Our group decided to use a mixed-method approach for the evaluation.
17
Xinqi Li 52.2 18 * Quantitative data will be derived during the experiment such as the number of mistakes the participant makes during the quiz.
Xinqi Li 54.1 19 * Qualitative data expected to be gathered through questionnaires, such as to what extent participants are satisfied with using the robot, is also adopted for evaluation.
Xinqi Li 55.1 20
Xinqi Li 54.1 21 By measuring these two types of data, we will manage to assess if our claims are achieved and the research questions are answered.
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 22
Andrei Stefan 1.2 23 == Participants ==
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 24
Xinqi Li 60.1 25 We invited 19 participants. To validate our research question that the quiz will help people better memorize music-activity links, participants will be divided into two groups, Group A with the intelligent robot(9 participants) and Group B(10 participants) with the dumb robot.
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 26
Andrei Stefan 1.2 27 == Experimental design ==
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 28
Xinqi Li 58.1 29 The experiment will be conducted to simulate the reinforcement learning process of musical memory related to daily activities and to investigate if the quiz is indeed able to help with the learning.
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 30
Rembrandt Oltmans 8.1 31
Xinqi Li 58.1 32 === Evaluation Step ===
33
34 First, all participants would sign a consent form that informed them of the usage of the collected data and our goal of evaluations.
35
36 ==== Step 1 ====
37
38 In our prototype, users can personalize the link between music and activities based on their existing intrinsic knowledge. But due to the limited time and requiring a comparable result between groups, in evaluation, we forced 6 pieces of music and activities. Participants listened to the music and were asked the remember the associated activities.
39
40 ==== Step 2 ====
41
Xinqi Li 60.1 42 Participants in two groups would play with the robot for 3 minutes. Participants in group A would play with the intelligent robot and group B would play with the dumb robot.
Xinqi Li 58.1 43
44 ==== Step 3 ====
45
46 In the end, the participants would take a quiz to see how much they remembered. They are also asked to fill in a questionnaire including the feeling of the robot and possible feedback.
47
48 ==== Questionnaire ====
49
50 1. How many questions did you answer correctly? (Points from 0-6)
51 1. You feel the robot can help you remember the task. (Agree, Neutral, Disagree)
52 1. You feel the robot is annoying. (Agree, Neutral, Disagree)
53 1. Based on the given system usability scale, please give our robot a score.(0-100)
54
55 Except for the previous questions, we also collect feedback from participants
56
57 1. What did you like most about the robot?
58 1. What did you dislike most about the robot?
59 1. Do you have any further suggestions? (*optional)
60
61
62
Dongxu Lu 15.1 63 == Tasks ==
64
Dongxu Lu 50.1 65 **Event: Quiz**
Dongxu Lu 25.1 66
67 {{html}}
68 <table>
Dongxu Lu 11.1 69 <tr>
Dongxu Lu 12.1 70 <td>No.</td>
Xinqi Li 59.1 71 <td>Group A with the intelligent robot</td>
72 <td>Group B with the dumb robot</td>
Dongxu Lu 11.1 73 </tr>
74 <tr>
75 <td>1</td>
Dongxu Lu 50.1 76 <td>Memorize six pieces of music corresponding with different activities;</td>
77 <td>Memorize six pieces of music corresponding with different activities;</td>
Dongxu Lu 11.1 78 </tr>
79 <tr>
80 <td>2</td>
Dongxu Lu 50.1 81 <td>Play quiz with the smart robot for five minutes, which will correct the participant when wrong answers are given;</td>
Xinqi Li 59.1 82 <td>Play quiz with the dumb robot for five minutes, which will not correct the participant when wrong answers are given;</td>
Dongxu Lu 11.1 83 </tr>
84 <tr>
85 <td>3</td>
Dongxu Lu 50.1 86 <td>Test how well the participant remember the music-activity pairs by counting the mistakes made;</td>
87 <td>Test how well the participant remember the music-activity pairs by counting the mistakes made;</td>
Dongxu Lu 11.1 88 </tr>
Dongxu Lu 25.1 89 <table>
90 {{/html}}
Péter Angeli 6.1 91
Andrei Stefan 1.2 92 == Measures ==
Dongxu Lu 9.1 93
Andrei Stefan 46.1 94 During the experiment, count how many tries it takes the user to answer correctly
Andrei Stefan 33.1 95 After the experiment, ask the user to fill in the system usability scale and the questionnaire regarding mood and satisfaction.
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 96
Andrei Stefan 1.2 97 == Procedure ==
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 98
Dongxu Lu 29.1 99 1. Sign the consent form;
100 2. Complete the given tasks as instructed;
101 3. Complete a questionnaire
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 102
Andrei Stefan 1.2 103 == Material ==
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 104
Xinqi Li 61.1 105 Robot(NAO) with setting music, consent form, laptop
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 106
Andrei Stefan 7.1 107 = Results =
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 108
Andrei Stefan 7.1 109 = Discussion =
Bart Vastenhouw 1.1 110
Andrei Stefan 7.1 111 = Conclusion =