Changes for page Test
Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 13:38
From 95.1 to 96.1
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -117,15 +117,11 @@ 117 117 * As mentioned before, the small sample size made the accuracy of the result doubtable. Having a larger and more diverse sample group would allow us to more accurately predict real-world usage. 118 118 * The accuracy of the speech recognition system in the NAO and the availability of test subjects and robots also limited the evaluation. 119 119 120 -In the future, we could improve in the following aspects, 120 +Based on our evaluation, we proved that participants with our intelligent robot are more willing to play the quiz and consider the robot can help them remember the task better compared with the control group. Our robot still needs further improvement based on the previous discussion. In the future, we could improve in the following aspects, 121 121 122 122 * Test a full implementation of the system in a real setting with PwD. 123 123 * Research should also be done to look if the robot is actually necessary, or if the advantage of the system could be achieved by a cheaper alternative, such as a virtual robot on a tablet. (Also inspired by the feedback we got. One participant asked why we didn't create an APP.) 124 124 125 -= Conclusion = 126 - 127 -Based on our evaluation, we proved that participants with our intelligent robot are more willing to play the quiz and consider the robot can help them remember the task better compared with the control group. Our robot still needs further improvement based on the previous discussion. 128 - 129 129 = Reference = 130 130 131 -Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594. 127 +[1] Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.