Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 13:38
From version Icon 96.1 Icon
edited by Xinqi Li
on 2022/04/02 03:07
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 94.1 Icon
edited by Xinqi Li
on 2022/04/02 01:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
107 107  
108 108  Also, we collect some feedback from the participants. Most of them liked the appearance of the robot which is consistent with the reasons we choose the NAO. People are more engaged and willing to interact with a humanoid robot. Some of them complained about the speech recognition of this robot.
109 109  
110 -= Discussion & Conclusion =
110 += Discussion =
111 111  
112 112  We assume that our intelligent robot can help people strengthen the association between music and activities. The result of average correct answers didn't approve this. Several reasons existed. First, our participants were not real PwD and their memory abilities vary. Our group size(about 10 for each group) was not large enough. Also, Participants were only given a limited time. The short duration of the quiz and not using personalised music also accounted for this biased result. However, the overall usability score between the two groups and some quantitative results above also shows that our claim PwD are more willing to play with our intelligent robot and PwD are happy to use the robot could still hold.
113 113  
... ... @@ -122,10 +122,10 @@
122 122  * Test a full implementation of the system in a real setting with PwD.
123 123  * Research should also be done to look if the robot is actually necessary, or if the advantage of the system could be achieved by a cheaper alternative, such as a virtual robot on a tablet. (Also inspired by the feedback we got. One participant asked why we didn't create an APP.)
124 124  
125 -= Conclusion =
126 126  
127 -Based on our evaluation, we proved that participants with our intelligent robot are more willing to play the quiz and consider the robot can help them remember the task better compared with the control group. Our robot still needs further improvement based on the previous discussion.
128 128  
127 += Conclusion =
128 +
129 129  = Reference =
130 130  
131 131  Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.