Changes for page Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -103,10 +103,16 @@
103	103	From the middle figure, we can find that people in group A tend to think our robot can help improve the memory task and only a few of them thought our robot is annoying, as shown in the right figure.
104	104
105	105	[[image:result4.png||height="400px"]]
	106	+As shown in the above figure, group A with our intelligent robot gave our robot an average score of 66.7, and group B with the dumb robot gave 58.2. In this scale, we can see that participants are more willing to play with our intelligent robot.
106	106
	108	+Also, we collect some feedback from the participants. Most of them liked the appearance of the robot which is consistent with the reasons we choose the NAO. People are more engaged and willing to interact with a humanoid robot. Some of them complained about the speech recognition of this robot.
	109	+
107	107	= Discussion =
108	108
	112	+We assume that our intelligent robot can help people strengthen the association between music and activities. The result of average correct answers didn't approve this. Several reasons existed. First, our participants were not real PwD and their memory abilities vary. Our group size(about 10 for each group) was not large enough. Also, Participants were only given a limited time. The short duration of the quiz and not using personalised music also accounted for this biased result. However, the overall usability score between two groups and some quantitative results above also shows that our claim PwD are more willing to play with our intelligent robot and PwD are happy to use the robot could still hold.
	113	+
109	109	= Conclusion =
110	110
111	111	= Reference =
	117	+
112	112	Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.