Changes for page Test
Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 13:38
From 81.1 to 82.1
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ 15 15 16 16 Besides, Our group decided to use a mixed-method approach for the evaluation. 17 17 18 -* Quantitative data will be derived during the experiment such as the number of mistakes the participant makes during the quiz. 18 +* Quantitative data will be derived during the experiment such as the number of mistakes the participant makes during the quiz. The participants were also asked to provide a score based on the given system usability scale^^1^^. 19 19 * Qualitative data expected to be gathered through questionnaires, such as to what extent participants are satisfied with using the robot, is also adopted for evaluation. 20 20 21 21 By measuring these two types of data, we will manage to assess if our claims are achieved and the research questions are answered. ... ... @@ -98,10 +98,15 @@ 98 98 = Results = 99 99 100 100 [[image:result2.png||height="400px"]] 101 -From the left figure, we can see the distribution of the number of correct answers. The average score of all participants is 3.6 among 6 questions. For group A, the average score is 3.3 and for group B the average score is 3.8. We can also find that all participants in group A can learn something because they have no 0 scores but several participants in group B got 0 scores. In this degree, we can show that our robot do help in memory.101 +From the left figure, we can see the distribution of the number of correct answers. The average score of all participants is 3.6 among 6 questions. For group A, the average score is 3.3 and for group B the average score is 3.8. This bias can be explained because our group size is not large enough to eliminate the various memory ability. but we can also find that all participants in group A can learn something because they have no 0 scores but several participants in group B got 0 scores. In this degree, we can show that our robot does help in memory. 102 102 103 -From the middle figure, we can find that people in group A tend to think our robot can help improve the memory task and only a few of them thought our robot is annoying. 103 +From the middle figure, we can find that people in group A tend to think our robot can help improve the memory task and only a few of them thought our robot is annoying, as shown in the right figure. 104 104 105 +[[image:result4.png||height="400px"]] 106 + 105 105 = Discussion = 106 106 107 107 = Conclusion = 110 + 111 += Reference = 112 +Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.
-
result3.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.mona98 - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +217.7 KB -
Content
-
result4.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.mona98 - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +52.8 KB -
Content